[Histonet] RE: competency form

[Sheila Haas]

Well, it would be nice if that was the case but we ended up with a deficiency. It was rather disappointing given our overall documentation. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 9, 2014, at 4:37 PM, "Sue" <suetp918 <@t> comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> So I went to one of the CAP webinars regarding competency  And when I asked what about
> 
> histology there were complete silence on the other end of the line and than they said there was
> 
> nothing for histology. 
> 
>  
> 
> At our site they want something for very division so I put together a basic form and use it
> 
> for the multitude of major tasks in histology.  We are not getting inspeted until next year but
> 
> from what I hear CAP is planning on making major changes for the pathology protion of
> 
> CAP's checklist, what that means I do not know. 
> 
>  
> 
> Since CAP canot give us concrete rules for histology I think that anything a lab does is
> 
> better than nothing, and shows initiative on their part to meet CAP's requirements.
> 
> Since this is a peer review the inspector can suggest alternatives but
> 
> cannot say you are in violation because the do not "like" your form.
> 
>  
> 
> Just my thoughts
> 
>  
> 
> S. Paturzo
> 
> TJUH
> 
> 
> 
>