[Histonet] Slide labels used with IHC Instruments
Michael Mihalik
mike <@t> pathview.com
Fri Sep 11 12:17:56 CDT 2009
Sheila, I apologize to you and Peter and to whomever else I have offended.
I view Histonet as a place where people can go for knowledge and where
people can share their experiences.
I was trying to share my experience with LIS systems and information system
technology in general. I do admit that I had one paragraph in there about
our own product, but I was trying to illustrate a point. I thought I had
spent a bit of time talking about Ventana and Dako and as you've read my
other posts, you've seen me mention Leica and others as well. I always talk
about things from an information technology perspective. That's what I do
and that's what I believe I am good at. I don't know if you're from Ventana
or Daka or whomever, but please notice that I stated I have no problems with
what you guys are doing. In fact, I applaud you for filling a very needed
role in the industry. In other posts I've perhaps compared Leica and
Ventana, but I've only done so from an information
technology/interface/labeling perspective. I know very little about the
chemistry involved and therefore I am not qualified to say which instrument
is better suited for the task.
I think everyone should ask more of their LIS vendors. In that way everyone
benefits. But, how do people know what to ask for if they don't know that
certain things are possible. I was hoping to encourage people to ask for
further functionality from their LIS vendors... and yes, I fully admit that
there was some component of publicity. However, I do feel like it was 90/10
or 80/20 knowledge vs publicity.
So, please forgive me I offended anyone, but I still think there are a lot
of information technology aspects that people are not aware of and that a
majority of people would like to learn about. Everyone will notice that I
always publish all of my contact information and my company name. I'm not
trying to 'sneak something' by anyone. Competition is good for everyone.
Is it not?
And finally, Sheila, I wouldn't call you 'wrong'. You've got an opinion and
I respect it. I just disagree. I'll shut up now, and if you or anyone else
would like to talk to me please feel free to do so. (My contact information
is below, but to make my email address more obvious, it is
mike <@t> pathview.com)
P.S. We're at APIII at the end of September. NSH is roughly 2 weeks after
that. It's hard for us to be at both conferences and APIII is more computer
oriented so we thought it would be a better fit for us. If you happen to be
there, please come by. You don't even have to mention your name. I'd love
to hear some comments on our system. The more we hear, the better our
system will become.
Michael Mihalik
PathView Systems | cell: 214.733.7688 | 800.798.3540 | fax: 952.241.7369
-----Original Message-----
From: Tapper, Sheila J. [mailto:STapper <@t> smdc.org]
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 11:39 AM
To: Michael Mihalik; Mahoney,Janice A; Cordova, Jean;
histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Slide labels used with IHC Instruments
Hi Michael,
I have been reading with great curiosity your postings on Histonet. Other
vendors have been shot in the knees for doing what you appear to be doing!
You are openly soliciting!
I personally don't care to read your opinions about the various LIS and LEAN
based systems that are available - only because I view you as a direct
competitor! Your system may be as great you tell us - but I see it as a
sales pitch.
If you want to sell to histologists - you had best be at NSH. That would
allow histologists to view your product right next to your competitors.
I may be wrong, and if I am please correct me.
Sheila
-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Michael
Mihalik
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 9:58 AM
To: 'Mahoney,Janice A'; 'Cordova, Jean'; histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Slide labels used with IHC Instruments
Jan, we'll be at APIII in 10 days so it's going to be hard to turn around
and be at NSH, but we're trying. I'd be very happy to get your and other
people's opinion of our system. We think we have a very straight forward
and comprehensive approach to workflow processing. It's really an unfair,
but very simple advantage that we have. We built our system from the ground
up with workflow in mind. Other vendors built their systems years ago and
over the years they've more or less just added on. I don't know if you've
ever been in the Northeast, but have you ever seen those farmhouses that are
a hundred or two years old. You can see where each occupant just added on
to the house. It's a big difference when you can initially build the house
to provide the needed amount of living space. Our software looks like that
compared to other vendors.
Let me fully respond to your Vantage comment. (and btw, if anyone knows a
ballpark for Vantage, please email me privately.)
I'll start out with one of those SHOUTED statements.
I HATE Vantage and products of that ilk. Now, let me explain.
I love WHAT Vantage does. I just really, really think it all belongs in the
LIS. All this tracking and audit information needs to be in ONE system.
Having two systems means two purchasing costs, two systems to maintain, two
systems to look into while you're trying to track down a problem, and on and
on and on.
The reason Ventana and Dako and others can sell this product is because LIS
vendors have been slow to adopt these changes themselves. Not to toot our
own horn too loud, but all this data is contained in our system. In fact,
all this data is in ONE query screen not multiple screens. That's another
thing that drives me nuts -- 10,000 tabs or screens to see data. Show me
the things that I am most likely interested in in a query screen and make
other things like audit or tracking information a quick click away. Most of
the times when I query for results I need to see results. Show those
results to me and only those results. However, when I need something more,
don't make me go to some other tab or menu or something else that I need to
use multiple clicks or tabs or whatever the heck it is. One click to see
tracking information, period.
I went on that 'rant' to prove a point. With Vantage, you can't do this in
one simple click because it's a separate system.
Now, is it better than nothing? Sure, it is. If I was you and I was stuck
on my existing LIS, I'd probably go for Vantage because it's cheaper than a
new system, but to be honest, I'm not even sure of that. I know Vantage is
expensive. I just don't know 'how' expensive.
Finally, don't get me wrong. I'm not mad or upset with Ventana or Dako or
whomever. They're doing a good job filling a niche. If I'm upset with
anyone, it's the LIS vendors. Of course, they're my competitors, so in a
way I'm happy.
Thank you all for listening.
Michael Mihalik
PathView Systems | cell: 214.733.7688 | 800.798.3540 | fax: 952.241.7369
-----Original Message-----
From: Mahoney,Janice A [mailto:Janice.Mahoney <@t> alegent.org]
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 10:01 AM
To: 'Michael Mihalik'; 'Cordova, Jean'; histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Slide labels used with IHC Instruments
Cerner Millennium
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Mihalik [mailto:mike <@t> pathview.com]
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 8:31 AM
To: Mahoney,Janice A; 'Cordova, Jean'; histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Slide labels used with IHC Instruments
Janice, may I ask whom you have for your LIS?
Michael Mihalik
PathView Systems | cell: 214.733.7688 | 800.798.3540 | fax: 952.241.7369
-----Original Message-----
From: Mahoney,Janice A [mailto:Janice.Mahoney <@t> alegent.org]
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 9:14 AM
To: 'Michael Mihalik'; 'Cordova, Jean'; histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Slide labels used with IHC Instruments
We have Ventana IHC instruments and Ventana Vantage for labeling, tracking,
QA, workload stats, etc, etc. It allows for the best process flow you can
imagine. I'm very into "processes" and this system will reduce if not
eliminate your errors. We were already a LEAN lab and with the addition of
Vantage we reduced TAT by about 30% and virtually eliminated labeling
errors.
I'd suggest looking into Vantage before I'd venture into more costly
interfaces that will just get you a label that can be read by an instrument.
Vantage will give you so much more. Check it out.
Jan Mahoney
Omaha, NE
-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Michael
Mihalik
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 4:40 PM
To: 'Cordova, Jean'; histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Slide labels used with IHC Instruments
Actually, Jean it's a different story for Leica.
With Ventana you HAVE to use THEIR labels. That's not the case with Leica.
Succinctly, this means that you can use your LIS labels on a slide and the
Lecia will read them and that's that.
On the Ventana equipment, the slide MUST have the VENTANA slide label on the
slide. Some powerpath users have gotten the powerpath barcode on the
Ventana slide label and we're about to try and place our LIS slide label on
the back of the slide.
Purely, and I mean PURELY, from a labeling process, I would argue that the
Leica is better suited for process flow.
Michael Mihalik
PathView Systems | cell: 214.733.7688 | 800.798.3540 | fax: 952.241.7369
-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Cordova,
Jean
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 5:17 PM
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Slide labels used with IHC Instruments
While our lab doesn't have the Ventana stainer I am assuming that the
principle is the same for the Leica Bond. We are using slide labels
generated from PowerPath on our slides for the Bond
Immunostainer.without any issues. We do have an interface in place.
Jean Cordova HT/HTL (ASCP)
Pathology Manager
Northwest Pathology Services LLC
541-341-8039
This message is intended solely for the use of the individual and entity to
whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable state and federal
laws. If you are not the addressee, or are not authorized to receive for
the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy,
distribute, or disclose to anyone this message or the information contained
herein. If you have received this message in error, immediately advise the
sender by reply email and destroy this message.
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
Sponsored by Catholic Health Initiatives and Immanuel Health Systems,
Alegent Health is faithful to the healing ministry of Jesus Christ,
providing high quality care for the body, mind and spirit of every person.
The information contained in this communication, including attachments, is
confidential and private and intended only for the use of the addressees.
Unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you received this communication in error, please
inform us of the erroneous delivery by return e-mail message from your
computer. Additionally, although all attachments have been scanned at the
source for viruses, the recipient should check any attachments for the
presence of viruses before opening. Alegent Health accepts no liability for
any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. Thank you for
your cooperation.
Sponsored by Catholic Health Initiatives and Immanuel Health Systems,
Alegent Health is faithful to the healing ministry of Jesus Christ,
providing high quality care for the body, mind and spirit of every person.
The information contained in this communication, including attachments, is
confidential and private and intended only for the use of the addressees.
Unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you received this communication in error, please
inform us of the erroneous delivery by return e-mail message from your
computer. Additionally, although all attachments have been scanned at the
source for viruses, the recipient should check any attachments for the
presence of viruses before opening. Alegent Health accepts no liability for
any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. Thank you for
your cooperation.
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and
privileged information for the use of the designated recipients named above.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have
received this communication in error and that any review, disclosure,
dissemination, distribution or copying of it or its contents is prohibited.
As required by federal and state laws, you need to hold this information as
privileged and confidential. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify the sender and destroy all copies of this communication
and any attachments.
More information about the Histonet
mailing list