[Histonet] Good Perfusion...

Chana de Wolf chana.de.wolf <@t> gmail.com
Tue Jun 30 14:37:20 CDT 2009


Histonetters,

Perfusion under deep anesthesia is most certainly not unethical NOR illegal,
and, in fact (as mentioned by Jo Dee), it is necessary for optimal perfusion
and fixation -- the intracellular ischemic cascade begins immediately upon
circulatory arrest, setting off a chain of events highly detrimental to
subsequent perfusion. Indeed, ischemia quickly leads to the "no-reflow"
phenomenon, effectively guaranteeing that you are not perfusing all tissues
adequately at all! It is therefore *most* beneficial to begin perfusion with
a beating heart, and every perfusion protocol I have ever worked under
requires it (especially if the tissues are to be used for EM).

I perform around 5-10 perfusions per week *specifically* to study the
effects of ischemia on reperfusion and neural ultrastructure.

Of course, you should check with your institution's particular rules and
regulations, but perfusion begun under anesthesia is scientifically
justified for the reasons mentioned above and should therefore be relatively
easy to have approved by your IACUC.

Sincerely,

Chana de Wolf

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Jo Dee Fish <jfish <@t> gladstone.ucsf.edu>wrote:

> Dear Jerry and histonetters,
>
> I don't believe this is unethical or illegal.  It is written into our IACUC
> approved protocols as follows:
>
> Chemical Method of Euthanasia:  "Perfusion under general anesthesia,
> Avertin
> or Halothane induced.  Bilateral thoracotomy."
>
> Could it only be forbidden by your facility?
>
> I wonder if other facilities have rules against such things.  But we insist
> that our investigators use perfusion under anesthsia because the deeper
> tissues are much better fixed and blood removal is more thorough and
> complete by this method.
>
> Jo Dee
>
>
> ~~Jo Dee Fish~~
> Senior Research Technologist
> The J. David Gladstone Institutes
> Co-manager Histology and Microscopy Core
>
> Telephone: (415) 734-2567
> Fax: (415) 355-0824
> E-mail: jfish <@t> gladstone.ucsf.edu
>
> Mailing address:
> The J. David Gladstone Institutes
> 1650 Owens Street
> San Francisco, CA 94158
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of JR R
> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 10:49 AM
> To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Subject: [Histonet] Good Perfusion...
>
>
> No, I wouldn't nick the atrium.
>
> Instead, cut the femoral artery at the groin.
>
> And of course, you cannot perfuse a living, anesthetized animal.  That
> would
> be unethical and also illegal.
>
> Jerry Ricks
> Research Scientist
> University of Washington
> Department of Pathology
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Insert movie times and more without leaving HotmailR.
>
> http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutori
> al_QuickAdd_062009_______________________________________________<http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutori%0Aal_QuickAdd_062009_______________________________________________>
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>


More information about the Histonet mailing list