[Histonet] Fixed frozen non-paraffin mouse brain
Hobbs, Carl
carl.hobbs at kcl.ac.uk
Sun Jul 5 14:25:51 CDT 2020
Prof. Kiernan, as usual, provides us all with such a depth/breadth of particular information/advice.
His Histological and Histochemical methods BIBLE is still my favourite read.
Respect
Most researchers fix in depolymerised Paraformaldehyde because someone must've originally thought:
" Hang on, if we fix in commercially bought 40% Formalin, it's got 10% methanol added ( to slow rate of formaldehyde repolymerisation) ...that will compete with Formaldehyde fixation.
So, we get coagulative and additive fixation. That is not good, folks....let's get pure and use depolymerised Paraformaldehyde: pure methylene glycol polymer"
I am sure Professor Kiernan can correct my inaccuracies!
Anyway......I've never noticed any difference: I've worked in diagnostic labs ( unfixed frozen muscle/renal/rectal bx) and also research labs ( unfixed/ fixed frozen tissues) using both fixing solutions
I have not noticed any IHC/IF difference in reactivity.
Many primary abs do NOT work even with fixed/unfixed frozen....some of them WILL need HIER ( at 90C rather than M/W or pressure cooker AR but, only fixed frozen of course), imho.
Part of the problem is whether the antigen is linear or 3D...sorry for simplicity.
I can successfully snap-freeze fixed/unfixed rat/ms brain hemispheres without using sucrose ( success measured by lack of holes at the LM level).
This is because I was trained in a diagnostic lab to freeze fast but, effectively.
It is a technique that requires experience for consistency of success....sometimes I fail!
The reason most use 20/30% sucrose is to give poor a snap-freezing technique a chance to avoid ice-crystal artefact, as stated by Kiernan).
Sucrose is no panacea.....technique is everything.
My pennyworth-illy
Carl
Carl Hobbs FIBMS
Histology and Imaging Manager
Wolfson CARD
Guys Campus, London Bridge
Kings College London
London
SE1 1UL
020 7848 6813
More information about the Histonet
mailing list