[Histonet] Benchmarks for Reprocessing

Morken, Timothy Timothy.Morken at ucsf.edu
Wed May 8 15:39:08 CDT 2019

We try to be at 0.5% or less. We monitored as a quality indicator for several years and had to modify something to get to that point, but it is pretty steady now. We have new residents constantly rotating into pathology so it is a training issue every month. 

Tim Morken
Supervisor, Electron Microscopy/Neuromuscular Special Studies
Department of Pathology
UC San Francisco Medical Center

-----Original Message-----
From: Cristi Rigazio via Histonet [mailto:histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2019 1:20 PM
To: histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Benchmarks for Reprocessing

> Good afternoon Fellow histonetters!
> I was wondering if there are any tertiary institutions out there that have set a benchmark for reprocessing tissue?  We tend to be less than 1%, but would love to see what others think is reasonable.
> Thanks for the feedback and hope you all are having an excellent day!
> Cristi

Histonet mailing list
Histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu

More information about the Histonet mailing list