[Histonet] Vendor with all items needed/ Histonet Digest, Vol 182, Issue 3

John O'Brien john at imebinc.com
Thu Jan 3 12:56:32 CST 2019


Hi Heather,
     Please contact IMEB INC for pricing and service on all your pathology
supplies, chemical needs and Pathology instruments.
We will provide the service you require to keep cost down,
Contact travis at imebinc.com
Or   sales at imebinc.com
Web site  www.imebinc.com
Regards,
IMEB INC

-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-request at lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-request at lists.utsouthwestern.edu] 
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2019 10:00 AM
To: histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Histonet Digest, Vol 182, Issue 3

Send Histonet mailing list submissions to
	histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	histonet-request at lists.utsouthwestern.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
	histonet-owner at lists.utsouthwestern.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of Histonet digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. IHC Negative reagent controls (Cayman Fleck)
   2. Re: IHC Negative reagent controls (Tony Henwood (SCHN))
   3. AM to statlab and recommendations (Heather Marlatt)
   4. Re: IHC Negative reagent controls (John Garratt)
   5. IHC-H&E-IHC HELP... (Curt)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 02:48:10 +0000
From: Cayman Fleck <caymanfleck at hotmail.com>
To: "histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
	<histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Subject: [Histonet] IHC Negative reagent controls
Message-ID:
	
<BN3PR13MB06734B9C15CC4ECBE24D41E9B18D0 at BN3PR13MB0673.namprd13.prod.outlook.
com>
	
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

A question that came up regarding negative reagent controls for
IHC...currently using Ventana i-View.  Our regular negative control goes
through the standard antigen retrieval steps, like 99% of our antibodies.
However there are a small number of antibodies that require enzyme as well
(Protease 1).  I've seen a number of suggestions regarding this for the
negative reagent control...some say use an additional negative control
protocol that includes the protease, some say to use a single negative
control protocol and just include the harshest cell conditioning that any of
your protocols use (so basically use the cell conditioning + protease
negative control for all antibodies)...i-View is not polymer-based so we
need to continue using negative controls.  Any thoughts or advice?

Frank

Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 04:06:57 +0000
From: "Tony Henwood (SCHN)" <tony.henwood at health.nsw.gov.au>
To: Cayman Fleck <caymanfleck at hotmail.com>
Cc: "histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
	<histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Subject: Re: [Histonet] IHC Negative reagent controls
Message-ID:
	<0e5c3ac509b7424e942160149bb36a4b at SVDCMBX-MEX024.nswhealth.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi Cayman,

Unfortunately, applying HIER to a negative control for an antibody that
requires enzyme retrieval (or no retrieval at all) is not appropriate.
The pre-treatment processes are different and could unmask different
epitopes.
If you are using a negative control then the whole procedure needs to be
same with the exception or replacing the localisation antibody with an
Isotypic antibody solution. (Isotype controls are primary antibodies that
lack specificity to the target, but match the class and type of the primary
antibody used in the application.)

For example, applying citrate or EDTA HIER to sections prior to using the
CD99 antibody (clone 12E7) can reveal perinuclear (golgi-like) staining of
some tumours (eg some colonic carcinomas) but this is not seen if enzyme
retrieval is used.

Hope this is useful

Regards 

Tony Henwood JP, MSc, BAppSc, GradDipSysAnalys, CT(ASC), FFSc(RCPA)
Principal Scientist, the Children's Hospital at Westmead Adjunct Fellow,
School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney
Tel: 612 9845 3306
Fax: 612 9845 3318
Pathology Department
the children's hospital at westmead
Cnr Hawkesbury Road and Hainsworth Street, Westmead Locked Bag 4001,
Westmead NSW 2145, AUSTRALIA 




-----Original Message-----
From: Cayman Fleck via Histonet [mailto:histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu]
Sent: Thursday, 3 January 2019 1:48 PM
To: histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] IHC Negative reagent controls

A question that came up regarding negative reagent controls for
IHC...currently using Ventana i-View.  Our regular negative control goes
through the standard antigen retrieval steps, like 99% of our antibodies.
However there are a small number of antibodies that require enzyme as well
(Protease 1).  I've seen a number of suggestions regarding this for the
negative reagent control...some say use an additional negative control
protocol that includes the protease, some say to use a single negative
control protocol and just include the harshest cell conditioning that any of
your protocols use (so basically use the cell conditioning + protease
negative control for all antibodies)...i-View is not polymer-based so we
need to continue using negative controls.  Any thoughts or advice?

Frank

Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete it and notify the sender.

Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are
not necessarily the views of NSW Health or any of its entities.




------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 08:19:15 -0700
From: Heather Marlatt <hmarlatt26 at gmail.com>
To: "histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
	<histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Subject: [Histonet] AM to statlab and recommendations
Message-ID:
	<CALaVVk4g1mm33v2qi=15UM4OqBkTg1wUA0P=t3p+bp6DpWLJPw at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Did anyone else use American Mastertech and is now super frustrated with
Stat Lab???

I?ve used AM for years and loved them, great prices and fast shipping, now
cost is through the roof and they?re shipping all my stuff separately
costing a fortune!

Looking for recommendations on xylene alternatives and safe mounting medium.
I?ve been using transcend and cover safe two American Mastertech signature
products but I?m running for my life.

I?ll be contacting a few of the other vendors I use as well but I?d like
some recommendations on xylene alternatives we?ve been xylene free for 4
years and I?m not going back.

Thank you
Heather


------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2019 16:41:03 +0000
From: John Garratt <john.garratt at ciqc.ca>
To: Cayman Fleck <caymanfleck at hotmail.com>
Cc: "histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
	<histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Subject: Re: [Histonet] IHC Negative reagent controls
Message-ID:
	
<roDLdKVu1mgL2MG3gSdX9mEy3xKCrHdcA_Pdd2wm98b9jpgQrtaoHaAXgaNkvRgbfG6KujZU7ly
CsZYaD2omb18Ivy0R15jWj3aL5Ws1jlg=@ciqc.ca>
	
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

The article referenced below may be of interest.

Standardization of Negative Controls in Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry:
Recommendations From the International Ad Hoc Expert Panel
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261516067_Standardization_of_Negati
ve_Controls_in_Diagnostic_Immunohistochemistry_Recommendations_From_the_Inte
rnational_Ad_Hoc_Expert_Panel


John

www.ciqc.ca

??????? Original Message ???????
On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 6:48 PM, Cayman Fleck via Histonet
<histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu> wrote:

> A question that came up regarding negative reagent controls for
IHC...currently using Ventana i-View. Our regular negative control goes
through the standard antigen retrieval steps, like 99% of our antibodies.
However there are a small number of antibodies that require enzyme as well
(Protease 1). I've seen a number of suggestions regarding this for the
negative reagent control...some say use an additional negative control
protocol that includes the protease, some say to use a single negative
control protocol and just include the harshest cell conditioning that any of
your protocols use (so basically use the cell conditioning + protease
negative control for all antibodies)...i-View is not polymer-based so we
need to continue using negative controls. Any thoughts or advice?
>
> Frank
>
> Sent from Outlookhttp://aka.ms/weboutlook
>
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet





------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 17:05:21 +0000
From: Curt <c.tague at Pathologyarts.com>
To: "histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
	<histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Subject: [Histonet] IHC-H&E-IHC HELP...
Message-ID:
	
<9C8F910F72893643B3C3793C3D67132B94D03BD4 at PATHOLOGYSERVER.pathologyarts.loca
l>
	
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Need help before I turn a mistake into an irreparable mistake...

We have some unstained slides that were supposed to get stained with H&E but
my guy stained them with IHC. It's complicated, we received slides and a
block, the block was for IHC, the unstained slides were for H&E, he inverted
the process) The point is, now the unstained slides are stained with IHC...
I know we cannot destain the IHC but we can simply run and H&E over them...
the real question I have is subsequent to the H&E... this pathologist
generally likes to see the H&E then order IHC on them based on what he sees
(we only have these few unstained slides, don't have blocks to recut)...

So the question is... if we've already run IHC, then followed that with and
H&E, can we return to run IHC on the slides again? would you want to skip
any pre-treatment, antigen retrieval????

I don't see this working too well myself, if they're already stained with
DAB, that would be present on the second stain...

Thoughts?

Thanks for your help.

Curt

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information transmitted, including attachments, is
intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and
destroy any copies of this information.


------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

------------------------------

End of Histonet Digest, Vol 182, Issue 3
****************************************




More information about the Histonet mailing list