[Histonet] Buffered formalin substitution
Rene J Buesa
rjbuesa at yahoo.com
Fri Sep 30 09:29:28 CDT 2016
Julio:Unfortunately NBF is the OVERALL best fixative there is. ANY substitute will be good for some things and not that good for others. Under those circumstances what to do? Simply use LESS amounts of formalin, do it safely keeping to a minimum its exposure.Under separate cover I am sending you 2 articles I published on the subject.René
On Friday, September 30, 2016 8:04 AM, Julio Benavides via Histonet <histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu> wrote:
Hi there,
The health officer of our institute has risen (again!) the issue of
substituting buffered formalin for some other less hazardous fixative .
I would like to know you opinion, and experience, in such matter. Is
it even possible? Have you successfully done it? In that case, which
samples you normally handle? We are a research institute, doing
several ruminant PMs a week, so big chunks of tissue to fix. Then, we
normally do IHCs with a variety of antibodies, depending on the
project. My worries are that, in case buffered formalin could be
substituted, you can never be sure about IHC and maybe antibodies that
were working before stop doing it.
Very many thanks for your thoughts and time in this issue. Greatly
appreciated!
Cheers
Julio
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
More information about the Histonet
mailing list