[Histonet] Cautery-Like Artefact

Tony Henwood (SCHN) tony.henwood <@t> health.nsw.gov.au
Mon Aug 19 20:35:20 CDT 2013


In this case I would also look at fixation time - increase it as much as possible.

Regards 
Tony Henwood JP, MSc, BAppSc, GradDipSysAnalys, CT(ASC), FFSc(RCPA) 
Laboratory Manager & Senior Scientist 
Tel: 612 9845 3306 
Fax: 612 9845 3318 
the children's hospital at westmead
Cnr Hawkesbury Road and Hainsworth Street, Westmead
Locked Bag 4001, Westmead NSW 2145, AUSTRALIA 


-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Roger Heyna
Sent: Tuesday, 20 August 2013 7:25 AM
To: Beth Brinegar
Cc: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Cautery-Like Artefact

Most of the derms are processed on Milestone's Pathos microwave processor. The processing program is 5 hours long.
 
Roger

>>> Beth Brinegar <bbrinegarhtl <@t> gmail.com> 8/19/2013 4:04 PM >>>
How long is your overnight processing run? Are these specimens being processed on an eight hour run, a four hour run, or something like a rapid run?

On Monday, August 19, 2013, Roger Heyna wrote:


We are experiencing a staining artefact on our H&E's, most commonly seen on skin specimens, but also observed on other specimen types as well.

Within the dermis and subcutaneous regions of the skin specimens, there are portions of what should be collagen that appear homogenized and stained with hematoxylin, instead of the usual eosin staining. It's often on the edge of the section and varies in size between different specimens. The pathologist is normally able to read around it, but there have been cases that were made more difficult to diagnosis by this artefact.

Our pathologists believe this artefact resembles cautery artefact, but the dermatologists insist they are not using cautery during collection.

We have a large derm service, and most of our derm specimens fix overnight. We have both microwave and conventional processing, and the "artefact" specimens have been processed on both. All of these specimens have grossing ink on them.

Any thoughts on what could be causing this? If it's not cautery, does it seem like a fixation issue? Has anyone seen grossing ink affect processing?

Thanks ahead of time for your help.
Roger


--
Beth Brinegar HTL(ASCP)
Anatomic Pathology Supervisor
Mercy Medical Center
Cedar Rapids, IA 52403


*********************************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender.

Views expressed in this message and any attachments are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network.

This note also confirms that this email message has been virus scanned and although no computer viruses were detected, The Sydney Childrens Hospital's Network accepts no liability for any consequential damage resulting from email containing computer viruses.
*********************************************************************************



More information about the Histonet mailing list