Re: [Histonet] Re: Number of blocks joelleweaver <@t>
Fri Oct 26 11:57:14 CDT 2012

I would say also bad management in my opinion. 

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone

----- Reply message -----
From: "joelle weaver" <joelleweaver <@t>>
To: <rsrichmond <@t>>, <histonet <@t>>
Subject: [Histonet] Re: Number of blocks
Date: Fri, Oct 26, 2012 2:03 am

It can definately be a sad situation. I know you are correct in your description in many cases. I wish I knew what I could personally do to impact this. 

Joelle Weaver MAOM, HTL (ASCP) QIHC
 > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:00:46 -0400
> From: rsrichmond <@t>
> To: histonet <@t>
> Subject: [Histonet] Re: Number of blocks
> As I asked before, do your pathologists have any input into any of this?
> About embedding: I heard of a recently trained pathologist who, asked
> about an embedding problem, replied, "What's embedding?"
> We spend thousands of dollars on a bronchoscopy or an EGD to get a
> tiny bit of tissue that contains a life-changing diagnosis. The
> specimen comes to the pathology lab and is grossed by a prosector who
> isn't allowed an embedding sheet. The embedder has no idea how many
> bits of tissue to look for. Then the microtomist is expected to cut 50
> blocks an hour. Then the pathologist has to make a diagnosis on a
> venetian-blind section.
> Good Management I'm sure. Bad medicine.
> Bob Richmond
> Samurai Pathologist
> Maryville TN
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t>
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t>

More information about the Histonet mailing list