[Histonet] RE: CAP vs. CLIA

[Morken, Timothy]

Here is the CLIA method of determining a high complexity test. 

Taken from : http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/IVDRegulatoryAssistance/ucm124208.htm


Tim Morken


********************************************************

CLIA Categorization Criteria
Each specific laboratory test system, assay, and examination is graded for level of complexity by assigning scores of 1, 2, or 3 for each of the seven criteria listed below.

A score of 1 indicates the lowest level of complexity, and the score of 3 indicates the highest level. These scores are totaled. Test systems, assays or examinations receiving scores of 12 or less are categorized as moderate complexity, while those receiving scores above 12 are categorized as high complexity.

Note: A score of 2 will be assigned to a criteria heading when the characteristics for a particular test are intermediate between the descriptions listed for scores of 1 and 3

Tests may also be categorized as waived.1

Criteria for Categorization
(1) Knowledge.

Score 1. (A) Minimal scientific and technical knowledge is required to perform the test; and (B) Knowledge required to perform the test may be obtained through on-the-job instruction. 
Score 3. Specialized scientific and technical knowledge is essential to perform preanalytic, analytic or postanalytic phases of the testing. 
(2) Training and experience.

Score 1. (A) Minimal training is required for preanalytic, analytic and postanalytic phases of the testing process; and (B) Limited experience is required to perform the test. 
Score 3. (A) Specialized training is essential to perform the preanalytic, analytic or postanalytic testing process; or Substantial experience may be necessary for analytic test performance. 
(3) Reagents and materials preparation.

Score 1. (A) Reagents and materials are generally stable and reliable; and (B) Reagents and materials are prepackaged, or premeasured, or require no special handling, precautions or storage conditions. 
Score 3. (A) Reagents and materials may be labile and may require special handling to assure reliability; or (B) Reagents and materials preparation may include manual steps such as gravimetric or volumetric measurements. 
(4) Characteristics of operational steps.

Score 1. Operational steps are either automatically executed (such as pipetting, temperature monitoring, or timing of steps), or are easily controlled. 
Score 3. Operational steps in the testing process require close monitoring or control, and may require special specimen preparation,precise temperature control or timing of procedural steps, accuratepipetting, or extensive calculations. 
(5) Calibration, quality control, and proficiency testing materials.

Score 1. (A) Calibration materials are stable and readily available; (B) Quality control materials are stable and readily available; and (C) External proficiency testing materials, when available, are stable. 
Score 3. (A) Calibration materials, if available, may be labile; (B) Quality control materials may be labile, or not available; or (C) External proficiency testing materials, if available, may be labile. 
(6) Test system troubleshooting and equipment maintenance.

Score 1. (A) Test system troubleshooting is automatic or self-correcting, or clearly described or requires minimal judgment; and (B) Equipment maintenance is provided by the manufacturer, is seldom needed, or can easily be performed.  
Score 3. (A) Troubleshooting is not automatic and requires decision-making and direct intervention to resolve most problems; or (B) Maintenance requires special knowledge, skills, and abilities. 
(7) Interpretation and judgment.

Score 1. (A) Minimal interpretation and judgment are required to perform preanalytic, analytic and postanalytic processes; and (B) Resolution of problems requires limited independent interpretation and judgment; and 
Score 3. (A) Extensive independent interpretation and judgment are required to perform the preanalytic, analytic or postanalytic processes; and (B) Resolution of problems requires extensive interpretation and judgment.

********************************************



-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Courtney Pierce
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 12:27 PM
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] CAP vs. CLIA


Can someone help me with the High Complexity Test with CAP vs. CLIA.
Thanks
Courtney Pierce
IHC Specialist
Quintiles
Translational R&D - Oncology
Innovation
Navigating the new health

610 Oakmont Lane
Westmont, IL 60559

Office: + 630-203-6234
courtney.pierce <@t> quintiles.com

clinical | commercial | consulting | capital


**********************  IMPORTANT--PLEASE READ  ************************ This electronic message, including its attachments, is COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL and may contain PROPRIETARY or LEGALLY PRIVILEGED information.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message or any of the information included in it is unauthorized and strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and permanently delete this message and its attachments, along with any copies thereof. Thank you. 
************************************************************************

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet