[Histonet] Rodent processing and artifactual spaces
Jackie O'Connor
b427297 <@t> aol.com
Thu Aug 2 14:08:56 CDT 2012
We trim our tisues the day after necropsy, put the cassettes back in formalin for a few hours on the processor before it starts. Our sections are durn perfect, if I do say so myself. One of the things I have found important for rodent tissues is to face the blocks and leave them on wet ice for about an hour before taking sections. No chatter whatsoever. We routinely cut at 5 microns.
Jackie O'
-----Original Message-----
From: Katherine Murphy <katherine.o.murphy <@t> gmail.com>
To: Elizabeth Chlipala <liz <@t> premierlab.com>
Cc: Jackie O'Connor <b427297 <@t> aol.com>; rjbuesa <rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com>; histonet <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Sent: Thu, Aug 2, 2012 1:39 pm
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Rodent processing and artifactual spaces
Thanks for the suggestions. Just a note about the processing
rotocol...I just recently switched to the lower percentages of
lcohol recently to try to remedy the horrible dryness and
icrochatter I was getting using a 70%, 95% X 2, 100% x 3, xylene x 3
et up where shortening processing times was not solving the problem!
hanging the reagent set up solved the microchatter problem but now
his other separation artifact has appeared.
On 8/2/12, Elizabeth Chlipala <liz <@t> premierlab.com> wrote:
I agree with Jackie, I process from 20 to 30 minutes a station for mouse and
rat tissue, but I process 45 minutes per station for brain and for skin I
process one hour per station. I find that once you gross the tissue samples
in they need to be placed back into formalin to fix additionally and I never
gross mouse or rat tissue and place in 50 to 70% alcohol that just causes
problems, that’s been my experience.
Liz
Elizabeth A. Chlipala, BS, HTL(ASCP)QIHC
Manager
Premier Laboratory, LLC
PO Box 18592
Boulder, CO 80308-1592
(303) 682-3949 office
(303) 682-9060 fax
(303) 881-0763 cell
www.premierlab.com
Ship to address:
1567 Skyway Drive, Unit E
Longmont, CO 80504
-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Jackie
O'Connor
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 11:36 AM
To: rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com; katherine.o.murphy <@t> gmail.com;
histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Rodent processing and artifactual spaces
I think the processing times are fine, sorry Rene'. They are pretty
similar to my processing schedules for both species. It could be more of a
fixation artefact as you suspect. Tissues will begin to degrade waiting for
formalin to get to them, and although formalin most tissues at about 3mm per
hour - whole organs tend to slow penetration down somewhat. The low volume
of fixative to tissue only compounds the problem.
Jackie O'
-----Original Message-----
From: Rene J Buesa <rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com>
To: Katherine Murphy <katherine.o.murphy <@t> gmail.com>; histonet
<histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Sent: Thu, Aug 2, 2012 12:03 pm
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Rodent processing and artifactual spaces
Rat and mice tissues do not have too much fat and are susceptible to
dryness
fter processing specially when using xylene as "clearing" agent.
also think that your times are too long.
he best processing protocol for rodent tissues is a sequence of 2-propanol
→
ropanol+mineral oil → mineral oil → paraffin.
t has produced great results in those labs that are using it.
f you are interested I can send you under separate cover the procedure.
ené J.
_______________________________
rom: Katherine Murphy <katherine.o.murphy <@t> gmail.com>
o: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
ent: Thursday, August 2, 2012 11:07 AM
ubject: [Histonet] Rodent processing and artifactual spaces
Hello Histo Gurus, I have a question for you:
I process rat and mouse tissues (kidney, liver, lung, brain, pancreas,
I, spleen) and have been seeing a separation artifact in the tissues
esp. kidney, brain, and heart) on the slides. I believe this is what
as described as artifactual spaces between individual cells or cell
hrinkage, as described by Carson (1997) under Fixation and
rocessing. The processing schedule that has produced this is: 50%
eagent Alcohol (RA), 70% RA, 80% RA, 95% RA x 2, 100% RA x 2, xylene
2, and Paraplast Plus @ 60°C with vacuum, at 40 min per station for
at and 25 min per station for mouse. Preceding processing is a 20’
ap water rinse. Tissues have been in formalin for weeks in most cases
ut not always collected ideally (low formalin to tissue ratio, small
ars used for large tissues, tissues submitted whole without slices or
cores, etc)--we don't have much control over this part. Does anyone
now what causes the separation artifact is and how it can be
orrected?
_______________________________________________
istonet mailing list
istonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
ttp://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
______________________________________________
istonet mailing list
istonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
ttp://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
More information about the Histonet
mailing list