[Histonet] to microwave or not to microwave
ael <@t> unc.edu
Wed Mar 30 14:40:19 CDT 2011
We had a microwave processor in the past, and switched back to a routine shortened biopsy run for several reasons. It is possible that the technology since then has improved to where you would not experience issues. However, microwave processing usually carries additional regulations (such as CAP for non-vented systems) and some machines require a lot of tech time to maintain. Most of the reagents suggested/sold for use with the microwave processors are alcohol or acetone based, which seemed to decrease the quality of our staining and sectioning. We have a shortened routine biopsy run on a vacuum processor that seems to do the job in the same amount of time with less additional maintenance and without the alcohol-fixed appearance in the tissue.
Ann Lowder, HT(ASCP)
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:44:02 -0500
From: Karla Sendelbach <Karla.Sendelbach <@t> thedacare.org>
Subject: [Histonet] to microwave or not to microwave
To: "'histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu'"
<histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID: <DC2665B881EF7A4B99275C654E4EEC070FD32A3A <@t> EXMB4.ad.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
We are evaluating rapid tissue processing instruments. I would appreciate any comments about microwave tissue process and rapid non microwave tissue process. Peloris II, STP 420ES and Milestone Pathos come to mind. Also, is there anyone who switched from microwave processing to rapid non microwave tissue processing?
Appleton Medical Center
More information about the Histonet