[Histonet] Re: saliva for glycogen hydrolysis

Gill, Caula A. cgill <@t> marylandgeneral.org
Wed Feb 16 09:15:29 CST 2011


I agree, gum sounds better not to mention the taste
CG 

-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Ingles
Claire 
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 5:55 PM
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Re: saliva for glycogen hydrolysis

Wouldn't GUM be a more palatable option? Who knows where some of those
rubber bands have been!
Claire

________________________________

From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu on behalf of Robert
Richmond
Sent: Mon 2/14/2011 11:09 AM
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Re: saliva for glycogen hydrolysis



Here's a truly hi-tech suggestion for doing PAS-diastase stains by the
spit method (which by the way is still how it's done by the small
pathology services I work on):

You can produce copious quantities of saliva by the simple expedient of
chewing on a rubber band for a couple of minutes. This used to be the
technique used to obtain saliva samples for determination of ABH
substance secretor status in the blood bank. (I belong to that elite 20%
of donors who are non-secretors, and Lewis-a positive to prove
it.)

Bob Richmond
Samurai pathologist and occasional sialogogue Knoxville TN

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



More information about the Histonet mailing list