Rene J Buesa rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com
Sun Nov 28 08:20:05 CST 2010

Bryan's method has 2 problems:
1- It requires a volumetric flask (one that assures a constant volume and it does that because the glass cap has a small hole that allows overflow of excess liquid), and
2- it will tell you the density of the liquid you placed inside the flask but NOT its strength, in this case the amount of water the alcohol contains. That would require a table to compare the density you calculated against that of known alcoholic dilutions.  
For the level of accuracy needed in tissue processing, any hydrometer will suffice, and you don't have to shake it, just wipe it dry with a towel.
René J.

--- On Fri, 11/26/10, Amos Brooks <amosbrooks <@t> gmail.com> wrote:

From: Amos Brooks <amosbrooks <@t> gmail.com>
To: "Bryan Llewellyn" <llewllew <@t> shaw.ca>
Cc: "Histonet" <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Date: Friday, November 26, 2010, 4:32 PM

Wow Bryan,
    That's pretty slick. Obviously weighing it would do the trick I hadn't 
thought of that. I'll have to remember that the next time I mindlessly try to 
shake the excess liquid off my hydrometer and have it break in my hands. Gosh 
I hated that! That is definitely a great and probably more precise way of 
doing it.


On Thursday 25 November 2010 03:11:07 pm Bryan Llewellyn wrote:
> Specific gravity is mass/volume.  In this context that is grams/millilitre.
> It can easily be measured without a hydrometer.
> 1.  Obtain a 10 ml beaker and weigh it to 2 decimal places.
> 2.  Measure 10 mL of the alcohol with a volumetric pipette and place in the
> beaker.
> 3.  Reweigh the beaker with the alcohol in it, again to 2 decimal places.
> 4.  Subtract the weight of the beaker from the weight of the beaker and
> alcohol, giving the weight of the alcohol
> 5.  Divide the weight of the alcohol by 10 to get the SG to 3 decimal
> places.
> Bryan Llewellyn
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Amos Brooks" <amosbrooks <@t> gmail.com>
> To: <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>; <Vickroy.Jim <@t> mhsil.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 3:14 AM
> Hi Jim,
>      Hydrometers can get really expensive. I searched around for one with a
> good price and stumbled on this one from Cole Parmer (now Thermo like
> everyone else in the world):
> Thermo Scientific ERTCO® Alcohol Hydrometer, 0 to 100% Tralle, 0 to 200
> Proof,
> Plain Form ... CAT# EW-08285-00
> I picked it up for $29.50, but that was with my University discount. I'm
> not sure what regular price is or what discounts you might be able to get.
> It sure
> beat the heck out of some of these $200 ones out there. This one has both
> percentages as well as ETOH proofs. It works well for us.
> Happy Thanksgiving,
> Amos
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:02:24 -0600
> From: "Vickroy, Jim" <Vickroy.Jim <@t> mhsil.com>
> To: "histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
> <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
> Message-ID:
> <24A4826E8EF0964D86BC5317306F58A55510FE3506 <@t> mmc-
> mail.ad.mhsil.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Does anyone know where we can purchase a hydrometer or other instrument 
> confirming alcohol percentages, such as 70, 85, 95, 100? We had a mixup in
> chemicals on a processor and I am going to be asked about instruments to
> confirm percentages before processing.
> Meeting with risk management tomorrow.
> James Vickroy BS, HT(ASCP)
> Surgical and Autopsy Pathology Technical Supervisor
> Memorial Medical Center
> 217-788-4046
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu


More information about the Histonet mailing list