[Histonet] Re: Troubleshooting IHC
Adam .
anonwums1 <@t> gmail.com
Thu Mar 25 14:52:32 CDT 2010
Yes. I block in 3% H2O2, followed by protein block (it's a mysterious buffer
called TNB that comes with the tyramide amplification kit), and then
avidin/biotin.
Adam
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Margaryan, Naira <
NMargaryan <@t> childrensmemorial.org> wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
>
>
> How do you block?
>
>
>
> I usually have: H2O2, Avidin/Biotin and Protein blocking steps.
>
>
>
> Naira
>
>
>
> Message: 12
>
> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:43:28 -0500
>
> From: "Adam ." <anonwums1 <@t> gmail.com>
>
> Subject: [Histonet] Troubleshooting IHC
>
> To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>
> Message-ID:
>
> <858249121003250843h2d0f16a2q1a74ad1091630300 <@t> mail.gmail.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I've recently run into a problem troubleshooting IHC on mouse bones. I am
>
> using the tyramide amplification system using a goat primary, anti-goat
>
> biotin, strepavidin-HRP, biotinyl tyramide, followed by another
>
> strepavidin-HRP and then DAB+ from Dako. When I use an isotype goat IgG, I
>
> get essentially no staining.
>
>
>
> I titered it once for immunofluorescence (SA-fluor instead of HRP in the
>
> last step) and got a titer of 1:800, and these staining conditions are
> quite
>
> reproducible. Then I titered for IHC, and 1:200 gave the best signal to
>
> noise. I did a batch of staining using those IHC conditions, and it stained
>
> beautifully, comparable to my IF. I then tried to repeat it on a second
>
> batch of sections processed in the same way, and the background was
> terrible
>
> (but not on my isotype slide). I thought maybe it was a problem in
>
> processing so I did a third batch of sections, and the background was still
>
> really bad. I see real staining sometimes, but I need to quantify this
>
> staining using histomorphometry, so I really need clean staining. Any
> ideas?
>
> The only thing I can think of is that 1:200 is just at the limit of
>
> titration that gives too much background.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adam
>
>
>
More information about the Histonet
mailing list