[Histonet] Ventana vs Leica

[Mahoney,Janice A]

Our Techs load all the reagents and assure that the slides are labeled properly.  With Ventana it is so simple to load the slides, they can go in any order so there are no mix ups.  Each slide has a bar code which matches the protocol.  
I would caution you when looking at pricing.  I have heard that if you have one slide in one of the modules on the Bond, that it needs enough fluid for 5 slides to activate the pump.  That would be wasting 4/5 of the fluids needed for that module.  Sounds like a-lot of waste to me.  I would ask about this for sure.
Janice Mahoney HT(ASCP)
Histology/Cytology Coordinator
Alegent Health Laboratory
4955 F Street
Omaha, NE
(402)717-2889
fax(402)717-5231
________________________________________
From: histotech <@t> imagesbyhopper.com [histotech <@t> imagesbyhopper.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 7:21 PM
To: Mahoney,Janice A
Cc: BSullivan <@t> shorememorial.org; JayLundgren; histonet; histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Ventana vs Leica

Unless someone corrects me (or even agrees with me!) in FL only a technologist is allowed to load the IHC machine, so no additional lean for us.  :o(

I would be interested to hear more about the savings though, as we are preparing to be in the market for a new IHC machine.  We currently have the Benchmark XT.



On Aug 26, 2010, at 10:08 AM, "Mahoney,Janice A" <Janice.Mahoney <@t> alegent.org> wrote:

> We love our Ventana instruments too Jay.  I don't quite believe the 40% difference in cost.  I'd like to see those numbers.  I know I save in tech time and the instruments are very easy to use.  We have histo assistants and secretaries trained to load and unload the instruments, saving out techs to do the things only techs can do.  Talk about LEAN!
> A little more from a LEAN perspective, the Ultra is the only instrument out there that is "TRUE" continuous flow. As soon as there is an open spot on the instrument and the antibody is on board, I can add a slide.  I don't have to wait till one of the 10 slide modules is finished.  Leica is still a batch instrument, it is just smaller batches than the older IHC models. I'm not putting Leica down, it is a fine instrument but I think it is important for people to know the facts.
> Jan Mahoney
> Omaha
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of BSullivan <@t> shorememorial.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 2:05 PM
> To: Jay Lundgren
> Cc: histonet; histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Subject: Re: [Histonet] Ventana vs Leica
>
> Jay,
> I currently use the Ventana and am very pleased with the results I get.
> The only draw back is the cost to run the instrument. It can get quite
> pricey. They added space on the antibody wheel but took space away from the
> slide area. This has impacted our work flow greatly. We are however looking
> to purchase a second one. This one will have continual through put. That
> should help out with TAT. Hope this helps.
>
> Beatrice Sullivan, HT(A.S.C.P.) HTL , AAS, CLSP(N.C.A.)
> AP Supervisor
> Shore Memorial Hospital
> 609-653-3590
>
>
>
>             Jay Lundgren
>             <jaylundgren <@t> gmai
>             l.com>                                                     To
>             Sent by:                  histonet
>             histonet-bounces@         <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
>             lists.utsouthwest                                          cc
>             ern.edu
>                                                                   Subject
>                                       [Histonet] Ventana vs Leica
>             08/24/2010 02:30
>             PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     I was wondering if anyone out there had experience with both the
> Ventana Ultra and the Leica Bond immunostainers.  I realize that most
> people
> have a personal preference as to brands, but I'm not looking for a
> knee-jerk
> opinion (LEICA RULZ!!!!11 or VENTANA FTW!!), just someone who has had
> actual
> experience working on a daily basis with both instruments.  If this is you,
> could you please tell me which you preferred and why.
>     I'm currently working for a facility in MT which has narrowed down its
> search to these two instruments.  No vendors please, they've already given
> their pitches.
>
>                                                         Thanks,
>                                                              Jay A.
> Lundgren M.S., HTL (ASCP)
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>
>
> Sponsored by Catholic Health Initiatives and Immanuel, Alegent Health is faithful to the healing ministry of Jesus Christ, providing high quality care for the body, mind and spirit of every person.
>
> The information contained in this communication, including attachments, is confidential and private and intended only for the use of the addressees.  Unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you received this communication in error, please inform us of the erroneous delivery by return e-mail message from your computer.  Additionally, although all attachments have been scanned at the source for viruses, the recipient should check any attachments for the presence of viruses before opening.  Alegent Health accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.  Thank you for your cooperation.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>