[Histonet] Cutting standards
sgoebel <@t> xbiotech.com
sgoebel <@t> xbiotech.com
Fri Aug 27 09:10:38 CDT 2010
Wow, you time your techs!?! Hard core!!! 45 seconds t sounds ok, but 45 seconds to section? What if the tissue need little extra care? Some are harder and some are fatty. If I had 45 seconds to cut a giant hunk of breast that would be alot of pr essure!!! Just remember crap in crap out...sometimes you have to
take extra time t =)
<
Sarah Goebel, B.A., HT Histotechnician
XBiotech USA Inc.
8201 East Riverside Dr. Bldg 4 Suite 100
Austin, Tex (512)386-5107
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Histonet] Cutting standards
From: <[1]histotech <@t> imagesb Date: Fri, August 27, 2010 6:50 am
To: <[2]histonet <@t> lists I know this question has been asked before ... Can anyone share with
me wha they are actually using as a cutting/embedding standard for your
techs? Fo instance, how many seconds (mins?) do you allow for embedding a block?
How many seconds(mins?) do you allow for cutting a block?
For simplicity here, I am looking at the "plop and drop" type
specimens, ie larger specimens that don't require specific orientation and can be
placed< have one section on one slide. I am trying to find out if the standard I have for my techs
is< such a block and another 45 seconds to section that same block.
How does that fit with what you guys are all doing?
Thanks!
Michelle
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
[3]Histonet <@t> lists.utsouth [4]http:
References
1. 3D"mailto:histotech <@t> imagesbyhopper.com"
2. 3D"mailto:histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
3. 3D"mailto:Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
4. 3D"http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet"
More information about the Histonet
mailing list