[Histonet] Practical Exam

Fri Feb 20 16:30:47 CST 2009

It is interesting that this topic of OJT/School/Registered/Non-registered resurfaces every so often, and that it still evokes so many responses. 

Time to contribute a new thought (at least new to me, you know, like buying underwear at the Goodwill) (Sorry, a little Friday humor)

Perhaps the practical was too narrow in its scope. It was certainly skewed in the direction of those in clinical work. Asking for human tissues when you had no recourse to them could, force a persons hand, to reach out for help in procuring tissues. That is not cheating. I don't think anyone here would call it that either. That is resourcefulness.  I was lucky, I guess, in retrospect, that I worked in a clinical lab with plenty of tissues and resources to help me get it done. It never even dawned on me that other techs wouldn't have the same resources.

That's not my point.

Those who choose to cheat will always be around. Taking a strong moral stand against it, that's a good thing, but also a given stance because we all learned from our first grade teacher that we aren't supposed to cheat. I'm certain if cheating could be proven in a practical exam, that person(s) would not have been certified. Tough to prove though, isn't it. I'm not defending cheating, but I still hold it was a weak reason to pull the practical.

OK, that's not really my point either - sorry, here it comes......

Now, I'm opening a whole new sub-topic. I offer my apologies for those who have been trying to skip over all these registry posts :}

What I'm hearing is a general desire to have the practical returned. Great, I'm all for it. But perhaps we need to look at the nature of the practical. 

Should there be a different one for those in veterinary histology than the one for clinical (human tissues) histologists? Should there be one that is aimed at those who do research work? 
It would in my opinion be logical and certainly fair-minded. 
The practical should be to show the you can do the work you are currently doing, albeit in a standardized way. That is everyones PAS on an appendix should turn out to the same standard for the exam. But is it fair to ask someone, especially in this economy, to do things for their practical, that are removed from their practice? 

Another sub-point: 

If I take my practical while working clinical and later take a job doing veterinary work, granted, I might have the very basic of skills down, but, as those of you in vet work can attest, it's a whole 'nother animal.(no pun intended....well, actually it was)

But the same would be true of someone coming into clinical from veterinary. 

Back to the main point:

It would mean two or more sets of reviewers for the practical portion. Logistically this would add a layer of complication in getting started, but it is not insurmountable.

If cheating can be arrested, or at least made less attractive, by something like this, and it might actually return the practical (because the cost issue is a non-issue, as it can be made up in the fees applied), it should at least be given a few seconds thought.

I want to take just a little more of your time to commend all of those techs who did have to beg and borrow tissues, reagents and textbooks to finish and pass the registry practical. It shows a type of moxie we don't always see everyday. But it doesn't need to be that way if the practical is ever re-established.

Now as to cheating and the general moral downfall of our society......I don't want to go there except to say that, no, I don't want to go there either.

Just a few more thoughts (just thoughts and nothing more) on the subject:

Should there be both a practical and written exam for each type human/non-human/research/pharmaceutical/food science of histology?

Should one be recertified when changing types of histology jobs?

Do blondes really have more fun?

Have a grand weekend, and thanks for plowing through an old-man's post. Next one will be shorter. Maybe just a grunt or guff-fa

William (Bill) O'Donnell, HT (ASCP) QIHC 
Lead Histologist
Good Samaritan Hospital
10 East 31st Street
Kearney, NE 68847 

-----Original Message-----
From: Pamela Marcum [mailto:pmarcum <@t> vet.upenn.edu] 
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 3:11 PM
To: 'Podawiltz, Thomas'; rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com; 'Histonet'; O'Donnell, Bill
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Practical Exam

Hi,

This has nothing to do with Bill or you Tom however, when the practical was still being given people did come on histonet and ask for tissue in blocks and help finishing the exam.  It was not a good thing and showed that some people were not able to acquire the tissues needed or were not looking for them.  Since I saw this several times and many of us were upset about it, I can say at least a few people did not do their own if they could avoid it.
I don't remember names or locations so please don't ask for them.  

Pamela A Marcum
University of Pennsylvania
School of Veterinary Medicine
Comparative Orthopedic Laboratory (CORL)
382 W Street Rd
Kennett Square PA 19438
610-925-6278

-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Podawiltz,
Thomas
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 3:57 PM
To: rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com; Histonet; O'Donnell, Bill
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Practical Exam

Rene, I can't and won't put words into Bill's mouth, especially since we
have known each other for almost 30 years, but I think his question was, was
there really a problem with  people turning in someone else's work as their
own. Where are the facts that it even happen?

Tom Podawiltz, HT (ASCP)
Histology Section Head/Laboratory Safety Officer
LRGHealthcare
603-524-3211 ext: 3220
________________________________________
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Rene J Buesa
[rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 3:36 PM
To: Histonet; O'Donnell, Bill
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Practical Exam

Bill:
In my time when you accepted somebody else doing YOUR job and YOU being
remunerated or accredited for it was called CHEATING and that is a moral
turpitude issue, and really a problem, not as you say that was "not much of
a problem"!.
René J.

--- On Fri, 2/20/09, O'Donnell, Bill <billodonnell <@t> catholichealth.net>
wrote:

From: O'Donnell, Bill <billodonnell <@t> catholichealth.net>
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Practical Exam
To: "Histonet" <Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Date: Friday, February 20, 2009, 11:00 AM

If, indeed, these were the two primary reasons for eliminating the practical
exam, they are weak and lazy reasons. An increase in the fee to apply would
cover costs, and, well, was it really that much of a problem of people doing
other peoples practicals.

I can't imagine it to be out of proportion to what might (I emphasize
"might" and add "but likely did not") have occurred
sporadically in all the years prior.

I won't pass judgement on a single source, but would love to hear from
someone who was a part of the decision process that eliminated this
practicum.

However, if it is true, my estimation of the ASCP has grossly deteriorated.

William (Bill) O'Donnell, HT (ASCP) QIHC
Lead Histologist
Good Samaritan Hospital
10 East 31st Street
Kearney, NE 68847

-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Rene J Buesa
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 8:01 AM
To: Victor Tobias; Histonet; Rittman, Barry R
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Practical Exam

There were 2 fundamental reasons why ASCP eliminated the practical part of
the
examination:
1- they got to the conclusion that there was no way to determine if the
person
sending the slides was the one who really made them, and
2- it was getting too costly to send the slides to review or to gather the
reviewers to qualify the sections, so they decided to eliminate the
practical
and made the changes we have now (renewal and CEU).
René J.

--- On Thu, 2/19/09, Rittman, Barry R <Barry.R.Rittman <@t> uth.tmc.edu>
wrote:

From: Rittman, Barry R <Barry.R.Rittman <@t> uth.tmc.edu>
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Practical Exam
To: "Victor Tobias" <victor <@t> pathology.washington.edu>,
"Histonet" <Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Date: Thursday, February 19, 2009, 6:30 PM

Victor
I cannot believe that you have said this.
Although I did not think that the practical examination was the ultimate
test
of skill ,  it did at least provide some uniformity.
With an extension of the logic that you use it is just as easy to allow the
pathologist to certify that the technician is qualified even without a
written
examination.
Without a somewhat standardized practical there is no guarantee that the
technician will have any practical knowledge outside their individual
laboratory.
Didactic without adequate practical knowledge is, as far as I am concerned,
useless.
What is really needed is a national standardized written and practical test
that is administered by NSH.
I am not holding my breath that this will happen.
Barry

________________________________________
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Victor Tobias
[victor <@t> pathology.washington.edu]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 5:03 PM
To: Histonet
Subject: [Histonet] Practical Exam

There has been discussion regarding the removal of the practical exam.
To me it has not been removed, but the responsibility has shifted to
whomever
signs off on the student. In the case of OJT, the pathologist has verified
that
this student can cut and stain. Of course what is acceptable to one
pathologist
may not be to another. Do they get tested in the art of troubleshooting.....
As
far as the schools go, they shouldn't be graduating anyone that can't
cut, stain and troubleshoot.
So I don't really see a problem with the absence of the practical. It is
Friday somewhere.

Victor

--
Victor Tobias
Clinical Applications Analyst
University of Washington Medical Center
Dept of Pathology Room BB220
1959 NE Pacific
Seattle, WA 98195
victor <@t> pathology.washington.edu
206-598-2792
206-598-7659 Fax
=================================================
Privileged, confidential or patient identifiable information may be
contained
in this message. This information is meant only for the use of the intended
recipients. If you are not the intended recipient, or if the message has
been
addressed to you in error, do not read, disclose, reproduce, distribute,
disseminate or otherwise use this transmission. Instead, please notify the
sender by reply e-mail, and then destroy all copies of the message and any
attachments.

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
THIS MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL.  
This e-mail message and any attachments are proprietary and confidential
information intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If
you are not the intended recipient, you may not print,distribute, or copy
this message or any attachments.  If you have received this communication in
error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message and
any attachments from your computer. Any views or opinions expressed are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of
LRGHealthcare.

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet