[Histonet] Best IHC stainer Ventana Ab's

[Akemi Allison-Tacha]

Most people are unaware of this, but that's probably because Ventana
has had a contract with Cell Marque for years as their primary antibody
and other consumables source.

--- On Thu, 8/27/09, Maria Katleba <Maria.Katleba <@t> stjoe.org> wrote:

From: Maria Katleba <Maria.Katleba <@t> stjoe.org>
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Best IHC stainer
To: "godsgalnow <@t> aol.com" <godsgalnow <@t> aol.com>, "gareth.davis <@t> hotmail.com" <gareth.davis <@t> hotmail.com>, "histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu" <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 10:40 AM

I was a DAKO fan for years... But after using Ventana, I completely changed my mind!

Sure you pay a little more, but honestly the amount is negligible!  In
 fact, after pricing out Dako versus Ventana, in the end the was really no difference. Plus the quality of the Ventana is exceptional. No one can touch their antibodies...

If they don't have the antibody, Cell Marque does. (Cell Marque even puts the antibody into a Ventana style dispenser so that you register it and run!!!) Who else does that? No one. Trust me, I have checked.

OMG... now I am sounding like and ad... didn't mean too!  I think Ventana is the best.... and you can't beat their customer service dept.. Dako falls short on tech hotline help.... Ventana will even try to help you, even if you have a Dako!  I am just saying.....

Maria Katleba  HT(ASCP) Ms
Napa CA

-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of godsgalnow <@t> aol.com
Sent: 27 August 2009 08:06
To: gareth.davis <@t> hotmail.com; histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Best IHC stainer


Ventana reagents eem to be a little pricey, but if you want a system that you can load and walk away from, it is the way to go.  DAKO is an easy enough to use instrument and is an open system, but they are going to a price per slide kind of thing, if I remmeber correctly.



I prefer the IP from
 Biocare, as is is an open system and a continuous load instrument.  And it mixes the chromagen online....


-----Original Message-----
From: Gareth Blaeuer Davis <gareth.davis <@t> hotmail.com>
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Sent: Wed, Aug 26, 2009 8:04 pm
Subject: [Histonet] Best IHC stainer





he lab I work in has been doing demos on IHC stainers Ventana Benchmark XT and
ako's Autostainer Plus.  We could really use feed back
from current users of both.  We are having a hard time deciding between the two,
o any input would be great.
What are the Pros and Cons with both.
Thanks,
Gareth Blaeuer Davis, B.S.,
 HT

_________________________________________________________________
otmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast.
ttp://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=PID23391::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HYGN_faster:082009_______________________________________________
istonet mailing list
istonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
ttp://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Notice from St. Joseph Health System:
Please note
 that the information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure.


_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet