[Histonet] CAP Question

[WILLIAM DESALVO]

I suggest that you  use your biomedical depatment. You need to establish a consistent process and then stick to it.

> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:01:18 -0700> From: rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com> To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu; thisisann <@t> aol.com> Subject: Re: [Histonet] CAP Question> CC: > > You should have your instruments checked on a regular basis. In our hospital we used the services of our engineering department, but you can contract a specialized company to do that. After each general maintenance, the results are logged in a special form you develop for each instrument.> René J.> > --- On Wed, 9/24/08, thisisann <@t> aol.com <thisisann <@t> aol.com> wrote:> > From: thisisann <@t> aol.com <thisisann <@t> aol.com>> Subject: [Histonet] CAP Question> To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu> Date: Wednesday, September 24, 2008, 3:26 PM> > I am going through the CAP checklist and came upon this question:> > ANP23075:? Is there evidence of ongoing evaluation of results of instrumetn> maintenance and function for all devices?> > The question before it asks if service reports are kept and they are.? How do I> respond to this question other than the equipment works after being serviced!!!?> Any ideas?> > Thank you,> Ann> _______________________________________________> Histonet mailing list> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet> > > > > _______________________________________________> Histonet mailing list> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
_________________________________________________________________
See how Windows connects the people, information, and fun that are part of your life.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093175mrt/direct/01/