[Histonet] Indirect Immunofluorescence in Dermatopathology

[Rene J Buesa]

For years we did IDF studies (indirect) using serum and no disclaimer was ever used. Pemphigus vulgaris and Bullus pemphigoid and related disorders are diagnosed, and even the serum in titred for intensity, as standard procedure.
René J.

--- On Wed, 9/24/08, Helen E Johnson <hej01 <@t> health.state.ny.us> wrote:

From: Helen E Johnson <hej01 <@t> health.state.ny.us>
Subject: [Histonet] Indirect Immunofluorescence in Dermatopathology
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Date: Wednesday, September 24, 2008, 9:06 AM

  Are Indirect Immunofluorescence studies on serum samples for diagnosis of
autoimmune blistering diseases considered standard tests in a
Dermatopathology Lab or would it be considered a highly specialized
diagnostic service (like dermatopathology, mycology, molecular diagnostic,
etc.) under Dermatology?
  When reporting results, do you need a disclaimer that it is for reseach
use only and not approved by FDA?
                                                                     Helen
Johnson (hej01 <@t> health.state.ny.us)


IMPORTANT NOTICE:  This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or
sensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise
protected by law from further disclosure.  It is intended only for the
addressee.  If you received this in error or from someone who was not authorized
to send it to you, please do not distribute, copy or use it or any attachments. 
Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your
system. Thank you for your cooperation.


_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet