[Histonet] AP Cerner Copath vs Sunquest Copath vs others

[Michael Mihalik]

Good day,

I wanted to wait a few days before I responded to this request as I
represent a system vendor.   I would love to talk to you about our system
and why your organization should consider us, but I suspect this would be
best dealt with via direct email.

To the group, I pose this question:

I try to be very conscientious of the fact that this method of communication
and interaction is intended to be primarily between histology personnel and
that vendors should be very respectful of that idiom.  Do you think my offer
above is appropriate?  Would you like to see our dialog?

I'd appreciate any feedback that you can provide.

Michael Mihalik
PathView Systems | cell: 214.733.7688 | 800.798.3540 | fax: 270.423.0968
 
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Cristian
Britos
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:26 PM
To: Richard Cartun; gu.lang <@t> gmx.at; histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] AP Cerner Copath vs Sunquest Copath vs others

Would someone be willing to share their experiences about Sunquest
copath as their LIS system for pathology versus other systems?
Needless to say, we are looking for options.... (currently we have
cerner copath 3.0)
Thanks,
Cris

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet