[Histonet] Not negative

[Rene J Buesa]

This reinforces my view that a "false negative" is always worse that a "false positive" although some pathlogists disagree.
  With a "false negative" you do nothing and with a "false positive" you do something even if it is not necessary, you err in the "cautious side".
  René J.

Kemlo Rogerson <Kemlo.Rogerson <@t> waht.swest.nhs.uk> wrote:
  
 



       
---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.