[Histonet] fixation post-fixation, difference of order used
ejschmid <@t> ucalgary.ca
ejschmid <@t> ucalgary.ca
Fri Dec 5 11:29:33 CST 2008
Hi,
I was wondering about the effects of using different fixatives in
different orders. For example, some of our embryonic material (chick and
mouse) is fixed initially with 4% PFA and subsequently is exposed to
glutaraldehyde. Chick embryos subject to this are successfully labeled
using IHC for anti-HH3.
However, our mouse tissues are fixed differently, being first exposed to
4% PFA: 1% Glut solution (Which i think is called a modified Karnovsky's
fix). These embryos perform poorly for IHC with anti-HH3.
Might it be the glutaraldehyde that is present in our primary fixative
used to fix moue embryos? Might it be that the IHC works for chick because
the glutaraldehyde is only used as a secondary fix after primary fixation
in 4% PFA? Does the order of exposure matter?
thanks!
eric schmidt
University of Calgary
Medical Sciences
More information about the Histonet
mailing list