AW: [Histonet] fixation-question
Gudrun Lang
gu.lang <@t> gmx.at
Tue Aug 7 08:31:40 CDT 2007
I have found the statements in Luna's "Histopathologic methods and color
atlas of special stains and tissue artefacts" (1992) in the chapter
"fixation".
Formerly I have read your book, which impressed me very much. And after
learning much about the staining-theory and pH, I thought Luna's statements
were wrong or at least not understandable for me.
What do you think?
Gudrun Lang
Biomed. Analytikerin
Histolabor
Akh Linz
Krankenhausstr. 9
4020 Linz
+43(0)732/7806-6754
_____
Von: John Kiernan [mailto:jkiernan <@t> uwo.ca]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 07. August 2007 08:00
An: gu.lang <@t> gmx.at
Cc: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Betreff: Re: [Histonet] fixation-question
Have you read and compared the statements you claim to have found "in the
literature"?
----- Original Message -----
From: Gudrun Lang <gu.lang <@t> gmx.at>
Date: Monday, August 6, 2007 14:19
Subject: [Histonet] fixation-question
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Hi to all fixation-experts,
>
> I've found in the literature some controversy statements about
> formaldehyd-fixation and want your help, what is the up-do-date-
> knowledge.
> -
> Formaldehyd can/cannot be washed out of fixed tissue.
>
> -
> Formaldehyd fixates slower in more acid pH; uncharched
> aminogroups react better than protonated with formaldehyd. And
> these groups
> should be uncharged in neutral pH.
>
> - Nuclear
> chromatin is fixed only by acid fixatives.
>
>
>
> What is your opinion on these statements?
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Gudrun Lang
>
>
More information about the Histonet
mailing list