[Histonet] optimal thickness for cutting of IHC sections
Poteete, Jacquie A.
japoteete <@t> saintfrancis.com
Tue Jan 3 11:50:12 CST 2006
We use 4 µm for everything unless the pathologist wants a thinner section.
I haven't cut a thicker section in over 5 years.
Jacquie Poteete MT(ASCP)QIHC
Lead Technologist, IHC Laboratory
Saint Francis Hospital, Tulsa, OK
japoteete <@t> saintfrancis.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Rene J Buesa [mailto:rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 10:12 AM
To: Harrison, Sandra C.; histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] optimal thickness for cutting of IHC sections
Sandy:
A 5 µm thichness is the general standard for most laboratories and we used
it, BUT
(there is always a "but" isn't it) if we were targeting a nuclear epitone
we tried a
little thicker (6-7 µm) and for cytoplasmic ones we tried somewhat thinner
(ca. 4 µm).
This approach was also used for histochemistry procedures: at least 6-7 µm
for
reticulum staining in bone marrows.
I hope this will help you!
René J.
"Harrison, Sandra C." <Sandra.Harrison3 <@t> va.gov> wrote:
Hi Histonetters,
Is 5 microns the norm for IHC sections? What is considered optimal?
Thanks,
Sandy
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Shopping
Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
********* Email Confidentiality Statement *********
Visit http://www.saintfrancis.com/emailconf.asp
More information about the Histonet
mailing list