[Histonet] PCNA versus Ki67

Connolly, Brett M brett_connolly <@t> merck.com
Mon Oct 24 16:44:40 CDT 2005

I have been a big proponent of using Ki67 instead of PCNA as a more accurate
proliferation marker after reading that PCNA may in fact carry over into G0.
Recently, some of my colleagues have been clamoring for PCNA.

I'd be interested to hear which marker other labs are using.


Brett M. Connolly, Ph.D.
Merck & Co., Inc.
MRL, Imaging Research
PO Box 4
West Point, PA 19486
PH 215-652-2501
fax. 215-993-6803
e-mail. brett_connolly <@t> merck.com

Notice:  This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp & Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this message.  If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from your system.

More information about the Histonet mailing list