[Histonet] Ventana Discovery vs. Ventana Benchmark. .
Charlene.Henry <@t> STJUDE.ORG
Wed Jun 8 10:15:33 CDT 2005
We currently have both instruments and the Benchmark is used for
clinical and the Discovery for research. The benefit of using the
Discovery: it is a more open system allowing freedom to program both
IHC, FISH, and ISH protocols using your own probes, antibodies,
secondary antibodies, and reagents. We even have the TUNEL assay
programmed on our Discovery. Hope this helps.
Charlene Henry HT (ASCP), QIHC
Histology/Immunohistochemistry Section Head
Department of Pathology
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of joyce
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 7:43 AM
To: histonet <@t> pathology.swmed.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Ventana Discovery vs. Ventana Benchmark. .
I am currently a Ventana Benchmark customer and use the machine for IHC
commercial and novel antibody characterization. I am exploring the
of a Ventana Discovery and would like to hear from people that have
experience with both. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
More information about the Histonet