[Histonet] re: rat spinal cord longitudinal sections
Tracey Couse
tracey.couse <@t> ibb.gatech.edu
Wed Dec 14 07:37:44 CST 2005
Carolyn,
I agree with you. I would section longitudinally so as to limit the
section number and time analyzing, especially if this is preliminary
work and you are simply screening. I work with graduates students who
currently perform similar studies in the sense that they are looking for
a fluorescent signal in rat/mouse spinal cord and many of them section
longitudinally.
Good luck!
Tracey
--
Tracey Couse
Laboratory Coordinator
Georgia Tech/Emory Center for the
Engineering of Living Tissues
Georgia Institute of Technology
Office: 404.385.2611
Lab: 404-385-6735
Fax: 404.894.2291
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu on behalf of
> Caroline Bass
> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 2:02 PM
> To: Histonet (E-mail)
> Subject: [Histonet] rat spinal cord longitudinal sections
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have a rat that was injected with a virus that produces a
> fluorescent protein. I would like to scan the entire spinal cord for
> the signal and thought the best way to do this was to section the
> spinal cord along the long axis. I don't know if I have the
> terminology right on this. I think this should be longitudinal
> sections. The histologists who is to section the tissue says that
> this is impractical. I know that cross sections (coronal?) are more
> common, but which method is better when we are simply screening for a
> visible signal? I am worried that I will have hundreds of cross
> sections to examine.
>
> If there is a published example of this anywhere, even a picture on a
> website I would love to see it. I have not been able to find
> anything that is helpful in deciding which route to go.
>
> Thanks for you help,
>
> Caroline Bass
More information about the Histonet
mailing list