[Histonet] RE: Fluorescence staining
C.M. van der Loos
c.m.vanderloos <@t> amc.uva.nl
Wed Jan 26 01:52:21 CST 2005
Dear Eva,
To my knowledge most of the traditional fluorochromes like FITC,
rhodamine, doesn't stand dehydration at all. So in your case it fully
depends on what type of fluorochrome you end up with after the TSA
procedure.
If you end up with FITC, the use of VectaShield
([1]www.vectorlabs.com) for mounting is highly recommended for
the prevention of photobleaching.
Chris van der Loos, PhD
Dept. of Pathology
Academical Medical Center M2-230
Meibergdreef 9
NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam
The Netherlands
phone: +31 20 5665631
fax: +31 20 6960389
e-mail: [2]c.m.vanderloos <@t> amc.uva.nl
----- Original Message -----
From
Eva C Anderson <eca9 <@t> georgetown.edu>
Date
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:10:41 -0500
To
histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject
[Histonet] Fluorescence staining
Hi,
We are looking into trying some Fluorescence staining. We want to try
a TSA Fluorescence System from PerkinElmer. The IHC protocol does
however leave me with some questions.
We always dehydrate our samples after staining. The protocol however
doesn't mention this. It only says that the samples can be
counterstained and mounted after incubation with the Fluorophore
Tyramide. Should we dehydrate and is there a particular mounting media
we should use to prolong the time that fluorescence can be detected?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance for all your help,
Eva
Georgetown University
Research Assistant
References
1. http://www.vectorlabs.com/
2. mailto:c.m.vanderloos <@t> amc.uva.nl
More information about the Histonet
mailing list