[Histonet] Bouin's Fixative Substitute
Rene J Buesa
rjbuesa at yahoo.com
Thu Oct 25 09:03:28 CDT 2018
If "New Bouin" has no pricric acid it is NOT Bouin. You can call it whatever you want but it is not Bouin nor it can have the "quality" provided by picric acid without picric acid.What you wrote is simply a deceiving"sales pitch".René
On Wednesday, October 24, 2018 6:10 PM, Linda Miller via Histonet <histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu> wrote:
New! Bouin's Fixative Substitute is a low-hazard replacement for Bouin's
Fixative. This substitute provides all the benefits of Bouin's without the
use of picric acid. Available in a variety of sizes and pre-filled specimen
containers.
Available at IMEB, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-request at lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-request at lists.utsouthwestern.edu]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 10:00 AM
To: histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Histonet Digest, Vol 179, Issue 16
Send Histonet mailing list submissions to
histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
histonet-request at lists.utsouthwestern.edu
You can reach the person managing the list at
histonet-owner at lists.utsouthwestern.edu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of Histonet digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. toluene substitute (Michelle Jamison)
2. RUO antibody (Erin McCarthy)
3. Re: Restaining old Heamatology smears (Eddie Martin)
4. Re: BMP-2 protocol for bone (Eddie Martin)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 14:48:50 -0600
From: Michelle Jamison <m.jamison at elitechgroup.com>
To: "histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
<histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Subject: [Histonet] toluene substitute
Message-ID: <a388a0e7-91fc-7555-36ac-3d8539d549aa at elitechgroup.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Hi All, I am from industry. We are interested in developing an instrument
that stains then prepares microscope slides to be coverslipped. If you do
coverslip, what substitute do you use instead of toluene to go to mounting
media? Thank you! Michelle
--
All the best to you,
Michelle Jamison
/Bio Research Associate /
/ELITechGroup Inc. / ???370 W. 1700 S.?? ???Logan Utah ??? USA
m.jamison at elitechgroup.com <mailto:m.jamison at elitechgroup.com> ?
_www.elitechgroup.com <http://www.elitechgroup.com/> _
Tel : +1.435.752.6011 Ext: 1474
Logo
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:30:14 -0500
From: Erin McCarthy <erin.mccarthy at tempus.com>
To: histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] RUO antibody
Message-ID:
<CAOjxy-HdKP0nZxUBX3O8iDijMeho==ro-BP6s6pkQFDmy0o2LA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Hi All,
I am looking to see if anyone has had any experience with the antibody AXL.
We are trying to work it up on our Roche Discovery Ultra and it does not
seem like it stains both nuclear and cytoplasic cell features. We only seem
to see cytoplasmic staining, and in general most tumors are showing negative
results.
I currently am using the Ultraview kit for optimization, our pathologist
likes CC2 for 44 min, Ab. Inc for 40 min using a 1:100 dilution.
Anyone have any suggestions that might help? If you want more detailed info
I can provide as well!
--
Erin McCarthy, HT (ASCP)
Pathology Lab Supervisor
Tempus Labs
600 W. Chicago Ave.
Chicago IL 60654
Ph:(312) 638-6344 Ext.3835
--
This email and any attachments may contain privileged and confidential
information and/or protected health information (PHI) that is protected by
federal and state privacy laws.? It is intended solely for the use of Tempus
Labs and the recipient(s) named above.? Nothing contained in this
communication and any attachments thereto is intended to waive any
privileges or rights of confidentiality.? If you are not the recipient, or
the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution, printing or copying of this email message and/or any
attachments is strictly prohibited.?* If you have received this transmission
in error, please notify us immediately at?**(855)-442-8305**?
and permanently delete this email and any attachments*.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 18:20:53 -0400
From: Eddie Martin <edmartin26 at gmail.com>
To: "Reilly, Laurie" <laurie.reilly at jcu.edu.au>
Cc: "Histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
<Histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Restaining old Heamatology smears
Message-ID: <0E7F124E-9821-4A32-A438-63F45AD4566E at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi Laurie,
Blood is considered a tissue so it is very much still Histo related.
Regarding your smears, this also occurs in our hematopathology laboratory
from time to time when we are scanning old slides and there?s a bubble under
the coverslip that won?t let us take images with our digital scope.
It may very well be that there is still a resinous permount film on your
slides from the old coverslip. This may simply be removed by leaving the
smear in xylene some additional time to remove the resin. Then place slides
in 100% alcohol to remove xylene residues. The following steps would be
rehydrating the slides with dilute changes in in alcohol...ie: 95%,then 85%,
then 70%, then in a few changes of distilled water. If you can?t get the pH
of your water to pH 7.2, then you could use a phosphate buffered solution to
achieve this in place of the distilled water.
Then place your slides in a working Giemsa working solution. It may help to
rock your slides or slightly agitate them to improve staining intensity.
I hope this helps.
Please feel free to contact me via email at Eddie.martin at NIH.gov
> On Oct 17, 2018, at 10:51 PM, Reilly, Laurie <laurie.reilly at jcu.edu.au>
wrote:
>
> Dear Histonetters,
> This is not quite Histo but related. One of our Laboratory Scientists has
removed the coverslips from faded blood smears used for teaching and is
having trouble restaining them with Wright's stain.
> Could we please call on the combined wisdom of the Histonet to try to find
a solution to this problem.
>
> Regards, Laurie.
>
> Mr. Laurie REILLY
> Histopathology
> Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences
> James Cook University
> Townsville Qld. 4811
> Australia.
>
> Phone 07 4781 4468
> Mobile 0448 957747
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 20:29:53 -0400
From: Eddie Martin <edmartin26 at gmail.com>
To: "Wilson, Lindsay A" <Lindsay.A.Wilson at uth.tmc.edu>
Cc: "histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
<histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Subject: Re: [Histonet] BMP-2 protocol for bone
Message-ID: <1F29A020-476E-4627-8E40-A4F3F146A864 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi Lindsay,
There are a few complications that will automatically come up due to
working with rabbit tissue, and also due to the antibody from Abcam that you
are using.
I called Abcam prior to emailing you on a hunch that I had and was correct.
The antibody you purchased from Abcam is unconjugated and first needs to be
conjugated to whatever method you?re going to use. You could conjugate the
antibody yourself. I already reached out to Abcam. It?s going to take them a
few business days to get back to me to see whether their own antibody can be
conjugated for IHC if that?s the route you?re going to go.
Keeping this email simple for a response to your question, it may be easier
to use another detection method for conjugating this specific antibody to
rabbit bone...possibly FITC conjugated tyramide labeling with Alexa-Fluor.
If you are insistent on using HRP it may be easier to contact me and we can
further discuss as there are easily two complications that will arise due to
the antibody you chose to optimize with and the species you are trying to
stain on.
Since you left your lab number on your post, I called and left my phone
number on the voicemail for the young Lab if you would like to discuss and
troubleshoot over the phone. I can also be reached via email at work at
Eddie.martin at NIH.gov
Thanks,
Eddie
Eddie Martin HT(ASCP), QIHC(ASCP),HTL
Hematology Team Lead / Histology Technical Supervisor The National
Institutes of Health Clinic Center - Department of Laboratory Medicine
10 Center Drive, Room 2C 360
Bethesda, MD 20814
> On Oct 18, 2018, at 12:57 PM, Wilson, Lindsay A
<Lindsay.A.Wilson at uth.tmc.edu> wrote:
>
> Good morning,
>
> Does anyone have a proven IHC protocol for BMP-2 on bone tissue? A big
plus, if you have worked with it on rabbit bone!
> I am currently using Abcam?s BMP-2 (ab6285) with no success. I have
performed antigen retrieval and non-antigen retrieval. I have used a
dilution as low as 1:50. I appreciate any suggestions.
>
> Lindsay Wilson, LVT, RLATG
> Young Laboratory
>
> UTHealth | The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston |
School of Dentistry
> Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
>
> 7500 Cambridge St. | Suite 6510 | Houston, TX 77054
> 713 486 4360 tel | 713 486 4333 fax
>
>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
------------------------------
End of Histonet Digest, Vol 179, Issue 16
*****************************************
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
More information about the Histonet
mailing list