[Histonet] Automated special stains
Cooper, Brian
bcooper at chla.usc.edu
Mon Jan 2 13:31:18 CST 2017
I tested both the Benchmarks and Artisans two years ago. By far, the Artisans were the clear winner on everything I considered to be comparable criteria (cost, waste handling, ease of use, reliability etc . . .) If you're interested, I can send you the comparison document I drew up. The only stain that was superior on the Benchmark platform was the Retic. Both platforms offer Gram stain; it doesn't work well on either the Benchmark or Artisan (we continue to do Grams by hand).
-----Original Message-----
From: Sanders, Jeanine (CDC/OID/NCEZID) via Histonet [histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu]
Received: Monday, 02 Jan 2017, 7:02AM
To: 'histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu' [histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu]
Subject: [Histonet] Automated special stains
Happy New Year everyone!
I am hoping to get some feedback re: automated special stains instrumentation. We currently have the Artisan but I would like feedback from those using different models...brands. We primarily need one for ZN AF, Gram, W-S (or similar) and GMS.
Thanks so much!
Jeanine Sanders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1600 Clifton Rd. MS-G-32
Atlanta, Ga 30329
404-639-3590
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
---------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
or legally privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure
or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this original message.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Histonet
mailing list