[Histonet] IHC repeat rate

Blazek, Linda lblazek at digestivespecialists.com
Thu Jun 25 15:22:54 CDT 2015

I would think that it would really depend on if it is a repeat due to an instrument problem or a human error.  I think that if a vendor says that a 5% repeat rate is acceptable for their instrument I would look for another vendor. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Terri Braud [mailto:tbraud at holyredeemer.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 3:32 PM
To: histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] IHC repeat rate

I once had a vendor tell me that 5% was an acceptable rate.  I am more inclined to use 2%

Terri L. Braud, HT(ASCP)
Anatomic Pathology Supervisor
Holy Redeemer Hospital Laboratory
1648 Huntingdon Pike
Meadowbrook, PA 19046
Ph: 215-938-3676
Fax: 215-938-3874
4. IHC repeat rates (Bitting, Angela K.)
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:08:46 +0000
From: "Bitting, Angela K." <akbitting at geisinger.edu>
Subject: [Histonet] IHC repeat rates

What does this group feel is an acceptable repeat rate for automated IHC staining??
Thanks for your responses in advance.

Histonet mailing list
Histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu

More information about the Histonet mailing list