[Histonet] IHC repeat rate

[Blazek, Linda]

I would think that it would really depend on if it is a repeat due to an instrument problem or a human error.  I think that if a vendor says that a 5% repeat rate is acceptable for their instrument I would look for another vendor. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Terri Braud [mailto:tbraud at holyredeemer.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 3:32 PM
To: histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] IHC repeat rate

I once had a vendor tell me that 5% was an acceptable rate.  I am more inclined to use 2%

Terri L. Braud, HT(ASCP)
Anatomic Pathology Supervisor
Holy Redeemer Hospital Laboratory
1648 Huntingdon Pike
Meadowbrook, PA 19046
Ph: 215-938-3676
Fax: 215-938-3874
   
4. IHC repeat rates (Bitting, Angela K.)
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:08:46 +0000
From: "Bitting, Angela K." <akbitting at geisinger.edu>
Subject: [Histonet] IHC repeat rates

What does this group feel is an acceptable repeat rate for automated IHC staining??
Thanks for your responses in advance.
Angie
***************************************


_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet