[Histonet] Anonymizing numbering system

[Rene J Buesa]

Good!
So probably when you really mess-up somebody's diagnose and have to pay several million of dollars in a law suit, your "higher echelons" will realize how stupid is the idea.Besides if you give a randomized number to a specimen and later use a code to "decipher" the randomized number, where is the "anonymity" advantage? Is it not the same as having a sequential number without the patient's name, and the list of cases with patient's names and their sequential numbers?
I really cannot comprehend the rationale and I am also sure that whomever came up with this "brilliant" idea makes much more money that you and never has worked in a pathology lab.
I pity your position of having to accept a stupid procedure and being unable to hold your ground because of fear of losing your job.It is infuriating realize how stupid people "claim the ladder of power"
René 


     On Tuesday, August 25, 2015 4:10 PM, "Wheelock, Timothy R. via Histonet" <histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu> wrote:
   

 Hi Everyone:

Thank you for all your responses and thoughts on this issue.
I should clarify that this new system may actually not be coming from the NIH itself, but perhaps from departments in one of our parent organizations. We have no written sources for this sort of approach. They may be understandably concerned about separating personal identifying information from clinical/pathological diagnostic information, so as to ensure confidentiality, especially in this day and age of increasingly vulnerable personal information. Assigning a randomized anonymizing number tracking system may help in this regard.  I have been assured that a "code", that is a way of matching the anonymizing number to a sequential system would be in place. So there would always be a way of "getting our bearings" at any point. My concern was mistakes and mixing up of cases. I still would prefer a sequential system, but at this point, we don't really have an option.  Plus, maybe it is just that I am used to a sequential system. I think it may be difficult to get use to at first, but if we take it carefully, and everyone cross-checks each other, it should be do-able. We shall see. Thanks again.

Tim


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet at lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet