[Histonet] Control strength?

Rene J Buesa rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com
Mon Dec 22 15:50:42 CST 2014


As I see it, control "strength" is less important than its ADEQUACY for diagnosis.Every time a pathologists signs a case requiring a special procedure WITH a control, it means that the control was adequate, UNLESS the pathologist complains about it.René J.  

     On Monday, December 22, 2014 4:00 PM, "Johnson, Carole" <cjohnson <@t> nmda.nmsu.edu> wrote:
   

 Hello all,

How are you documenting trending signal strength of your controls for special stains and IHC? I was asked this question during an audit and would appreciate your help.

Carole Johnson
Carole Johnson, HT(ASCP)cm
New Mexico Department of Agriculture
Veterinary Diagnostic Services
505.838.9299

To understand is to stand under, which is to look up, which is a good way to understand




Confidentiality Notice: New Mexico has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from state employees are public records. Your e-mail communications may therefore be subject to public disclosure. This e-mail, including all attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipients. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited unless specifically provided under the New Mexico Inspection of Public Records Act.
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

   


More information about the Histonet mailing list