[Histonet] RE: Histonet Digest, Vol 119, Issue 35
Scott A. Ely
sae2001 <@t> med.cornell.edu
Thu Oct 31 13:11:12 CDT 2013
We have tried both and got consistently better results with Leica. In addition to the better results, we have found their support much better. I have been told the same story, Leica>>>Ventana, by colleagues at other institutions.
I hope you find this helpful.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scott Ely, MD MPH
Associate Director, Hematopathology Fellowship Program
Section of Hematopathology
Department of Pathology
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
New York Presbyterian Hospital
Room: Starr 715
525 E. 68th Street
New York, NY 10065
PH: 212-746-2442
FAX: 212-746-2009
http://www.cornellphysicians.com/scottely/
Legal Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the original intended recipient(s) selected by Dr. Ely and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the recipient specified by Dr. Ely, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] on behalf of histonet-request <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [histonet-request <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 1:06 PM
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Histonet Digest, Vol 119, Issue 35
Send Histonet mailing list submissions to
histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
histonet-request <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
You can reach the person managing the list at
histonet-owner <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Histonet digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. RE: Did you see the listings concerning payday loans?????????
(joelle weaver)
2. Re: Kisser's Mounting Media (Glycerol jelly) (Paul Scott)
3. esterase (Stephen KumJew)
4. Kappa and Lambda ISH (Weems, Joyce K.)
5. RE: Ventana vs. Leica IHC stainers (Tony Reilly)
6. Remove OCT from frozen tissue block (Beno?t Delatour)
7. re(2); 33 (escott8 <@t> comcast.net)
8. Re: Remove OCT from frozen tissue block (Paula Sicurello)
9. Ideal Workflow Lab Design for Histo/Cyto lab Processes
(Ian R Bernard)
10. cell block staining issues (Martha Ward-Pathology)
11. RE: cell block staining issues (Tom McNemar)
12. RE: cell block staining issues (Martha Ward-Pathology)
13. Thermo Slide Mate (O'Donnell, Bill)
14. 6 biggest problems with color brightfield images (jerry sedgewick)
15. 6 biggest problems with color brightfield images (jerry sedgewick)
16. StainMate Stainer (Hans B Snyder)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:19:57 +0000
From: joelle weaver <joelleweaver <@t> hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Did you see the listings concerning payday
loans?????????
To: ihcs-wojcieszyn <ihcs <@t> smithsys.net>,
"Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
<histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID: <SNT149-W1415E75737A41A655DF02CD80A0 <@t> phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I get that post & link about once per week via the histonet
Joelle Weaver MAOM, HTL (ASCP) QIHC
> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:32:50 -0600
> From: ihcs <@t> smithsys.net
> To: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> CC:
> Subject: [Histonet] Did you see the listings concerning payday loans?????????
>
>
> Why this even get on your system???????????
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:26:55 -0700
From: "Paul Scott" <pscott <@t> scigene.com>
Subject: [Histonet] Re: Kisser's Mounting Media (Glycerol jelly)
To: <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID: <002601ced5ae$6041bdb0$20c53910$@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi Histonetters,
My company makes a temporary coverslip sealant called CytoBond that was
designed as a superior replacement for rubber cement in FISH but we are
getting increasing interest for IHC applications.
The seal withstands high temperatures without requiring humidification and
freezing, yet is easily removed in one piece.
CytoBond has been on the market a couple of years with an ever increasing
customer base.
Full product information available here:
http://www.scigene.com/documents/M225_CytoBond.pdf and here
http://www.scigene.com/details.php?pid=1216
I can send FREE samples to interested parties, you can contact me using the
information below.
Many thanks,
paul
Paul Scott
SciGene
470 Lakeside Drive, Ste F,
Sunnyvale, CA
94085-4720
408-733-7337 x 305
<mailto:305pscott <@t> scigene.com> pscott <@t> scigene.com
Automating FISH and CMA Workflows
<http://www.scigene.com/> www.SciGene.com
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:40:57 +0000
From: Stephen KumJew <stephen.jew <@t> sydney.edu.au>
Subject: [Histonet] esterase
To: "histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
<histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID: <CE97C91C.4FF2%stephen.jew <@t> sydney.edu.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I was wondering if anyone knew of an esterase stain that doesn't stain the neuromuscular junction too dark. Have tried a modified technique by BJ Davis which uses naphthyl acetate, acetone 0.2M sodium phosphate and azotised pararosaniline but the staining was a dark red/black. Tried reducing times and temperature and reducing the pararosaniline but no change.
Thanks
Stephen
STEPHEN KUM JEW | Senior Technical Officer
Discipline of Pathology
School of Medical Sciences | Blackburn Building | D06,
The University of Sydney | NSW | 2006
T +61 2 9036 9027| F +61 2 9351 3429
E stephen.jew <@t> sydney.edu.au |
W http://sydney.edu.au/medicine/pathology/
This email plus any attachments to it are confidential. Any unauthorised use is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete it and any attachments.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:57:39 +0000
From: "Weems, Joyce K." <Joyce.Weems <@t> emoryhealthcare.org>
Subject: [Histonet] Kappa and Lambda ISH
To: Histonet <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID:
<E3A4EBD57A691646BCCED4AA5911A0309B60A51E <@t> e14mbx12n.Enterprise.emory.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
For those of you doing these successfully on bone marrows - aspirate and biopsy, would you please contact me off the list? We're having issues with the tissues...
Thanks for your help!
Joyce Weems
Pathology Manager
678-843-7376 Phone
678-843-7831 Fax
joyce.weems <@t> emoryhealthcare.org<mailto:joyce.weems <@t> emoryhealthcare.org>
www.saintjosephsatlanta.org<http://www.saintjosephsatlanta.org/>
5665 Peachtree Dunwoody Road
Atlanta, GA 30342
This e-mail, including any attachments is the property of Saint Joseph's Hospital and is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). It may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message, and reply to the sender regarding the error in a separate email.
________________________________
This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
original message (including attachments).
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:16:43 +1000
From: Tony Reilly <Tony.Reilly <@t> health.qld.gov.au>
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Ventana vs. Leica IHC stainers
To: Histology <histo <@t> pathlab.us>, "histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
<histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID:
<E8088C46632C1C489B85680DD5C0D76B0281304DEA0D <@t> EXCCMSP10.qh.health.qld.gov.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi Mehndi
I have worked in labs that have used either the Ventana or the Bond. I have also been involved in evaluating both side by side in my current lab. As far as IHC is involved the Bond staining is in some case stronger but no more sensitive so it depends if you want punchy staining or more delicate staining. When asked our pathologists did not have a preference and were happy to get either instrument. Not sure about the Bond now but when we evaluated in 2010 their CISH was not up and working. We are very happy with the SISH on the Ventana.
If you only want to do IHC either will do the job and you should make your judgement on price and after sales customer service. They will both want to charge you for their proprietary reagents based on your workload. If you have a large workload that is fine, but if you have a relatively small workload you may be better off looking at some of the open IHC systems available.
Regards
Tony
Tony Reilly B.App.Sc. , M.Sc.
Chief Scientist, Anatomical Pathology
Pathology Queensland-PA Laboratory
________________________________________________
Health Services Support Agency | Department of Health
Level 1, Building 15,Princess Alexandra Hospital
Ipswich Road,WOOLLOONGABBA Qld 4102
Ph: 07 3176 2412
Mob: 0402 139411
Fax: 07 3176 2930
Email: tony.reilly <@t> health.qld.gov.au
Web: www.health.qld.gov.au/qhcss/
-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Histology
Sent: Thursday, 31 October 2013 2:00 AM
To: Tony Reilly; histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Ventana vs. Leica IHC stainers
Hi all,
I'm trying to decide between a Ventana Ultra and a Leica Bond IHC
stainer. Has anyone tried both of these? If so, care to share your
thoughts on both? Particularly interested in hazardous waste, tissue
washing, and DIF procedures.
Thanks to all in advance!!
Mehndi Helgren
Dominion Pathology Laboratories
733 Boush St.
Suite 200
Norfolk, VA 23510
757-664-7901
histo <@t> pathlab.us
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
********************************************************************************
This email, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). This confidentiality is not waived or lost, if you receive it and you are not the intended recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/received in error.
Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of this email is strictly prohibited. The information contained in this email, including any attachment sent with it, may be subject to a statutory duty of confidentiality if it relates to health service matters.
If you are not the intended recipient(s), or if you have received this email in error, you are asked to immediately notify the sender by telephone collect on Australia +61 1800 198 175 or by return email. You should also delete this email, and any copies, from your computer system network and destroy any hard copies produced.
If not an intended recipient of this email, you must not copy, distribute or take any action(s) that relies on it; any form of disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this email is also prohibited.
Although Queensland Health takes all reasonable steps to ensure this email does not contain malicious software, Queensland Health does not accept responsibility for the consequences if any person's computer inadvertently suffers any disruption to services, loss of information, harm or is infected with a virus, other malicious computer programme or code that may occur as a consequence of receiving this email.
Unless stated otherwise, this email represents only the views of the sender and not the views of the Queensland Government.
**********************************************************************************
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:57:12 +0100
From: Beno?t Delatour <benoit.delatour <@t> upmc.fr>
Subject: [Histonet] Remove OCT from frozen tissue block
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Message-ID: <52720D58.8010301 <@t> upmc.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Dear histoneters,
We got mice brains that were initially sucrose-cryoprotected and then
embedded in OCT - flash frozen and stored at -80??C. These tissues were
initially prepared for subsequent cryostat sectioning but due to
technical considerations we need to cut them using a sliding microtome
to get thick (40??m) floating sections. We therefore would like to remove
OCT before cutting. As OCT is water soluble it is expected that placing
the OCT blocks in buffer would help removing the embedding media but
thawing the tissue and then re-freezing it on the microtome stage might
not be the best way to proceed (expected formation of ice crystals with
known associated histological artefacts)...
We would appreciate any alternative solutions. Thanks!
Beno??t
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:21:45 +0000 (UTC)
From: escott8 <@t> comcast.net
Subject: [Histonet] re(2); 33
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu,
Joyce.Weems <@t> emoryhealthcare.org, childrenfirst75 <@t> aol.com,
lilzkin4 <@t> icloud.com, escott8 <@t> comcast.net
Message-ID: <1193952506.13210.1383207705065.JavaMail.root <@t> comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
referral program http://homegate-ng.com/Scripts/TATI.php
Sent: 10/31/2013 1:21:37 AM
>From escott8
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 07:14:45 -0400
From: Paula Sicurello <patpxs <@t> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Remove OCT from frozen tissue block
To: benoit.delatour <@t> upmc.fr
Cc: HistoNet <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID:
<CAPSjddZU_Aoc1_MbN0w5Yk6uQHDnEX8NcUGQsxSK-vwNBW2YoQ <@t> mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi Benoit,
You can just let the OCT thaw at room temperature then blot away the melted
OCT. To speed up the thawing process carefully cut away as much of the OCT
as you can with a scalpel or razor blade and then let it thaw.
I hope this information is helpful.
Paula
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Beno?t Delatour <benoit.delatour <@t> upmc.fr>wrote:
> Dear histoneters,
> We got mice brains that were initially sucrose-cryoprotected and then
> embedded in OCT - flash frozen and stored at -80?C. These tissues were
> initially prepared for subsequent cryostat sectioning but due to technical
> considerations we need to cut them using a sliding microtome to get thick
> (40?m) floating sections. We therefore would like to remove OCT before
> cutting. As OCT is water soluble it is expected that placing the OCT blocks
> in buffer would help removing the embedding media but thawing the tissue
> and then re-freezing it on the microtome stage might not be the best way to
> proceed (expected formation of ice crystals with known associated
> histological artefacts)...
> We would appreciate any alternative solutions. Thanks!
> Beno?t
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.**edu <Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.**edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet<http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet>
>
--
Paula Sicurello, HTL (ASCP)
Supervisor, Clinical Electron Microscopy Laboratory
Duke University Health System
Rm.#251M, Duke South, Green Zone
Durham, North Carolina 27710
P: 919.684.2091
HIPAA Privacy Notification: This message and any accompanying documents are
covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521,
and contain information intended for the specific individual (s) only. This
information is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient or an
agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any
review, dissemination, copying or the taking of any action based on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited . If you have received
this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and
delete the original message.
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:47:30 +0000
From: Ian R Bernard <ibernard <@t> uab.edu>
Subject: [Histonet] Ideal Workflow Lab Design for Histo/Cyto lab
Processes
To: "Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
<Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Cc: "BERNARD, IAN R MSgt USAF USAFA 10 MDSS/SGSH"
<ian.bernard <@t> us.af.mil>
Message-ID:
<D4F4C602B10B9F45B4E9271AF6380E161822863B <@t> UABEXMB1.ad.uab.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Histonetters, I'm looking for information or references concerning the ideal workflow design for a Histo/Cyto lab services.
Need to consider ergonomics, work space, equipment, safety, etc.
I know there are info. Just need source and experts to chime in. Journal of Histotechnology Advance article etc. Please reply to my work email as well.
Ian Bernard
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:18:36 +0000
From: Martha Ward-Pathology <mward <@t> wakehealth.edu>
Subject: [Histonet] cell block staining issues
To: "histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
<histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID:
<B2CECB1B6665A4479056478F6DE3C4AB197EFCF2 <@t> exchdb6.medctr.ad.wfubmc.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
We have something of a mystery here and I am hoping someone can help. My cytopath docs are saying that our B72.3 (TAG-72) antibody is not working well in cell blocks created from fluids (plural), etc. and that this is a fairly recent development (over the past 5-6 weeks or so). The surgical cases we have stained look great as does our control, which is placed on each slide. We have not changed lot numbers of antibody or made any up recently and the antibody is not expired, or even close. The only thing we can find that is different is that cytology has been rinsing the needles out with a product called Cytolyt, instead of saline and they started this around the first of August. Does anyone know if this product could cause any interference with our staining? The docs just say that the tumor cells are not staining and we are sort of at a loss here.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Martha Ward, MT (ASCP) QIHC
Manager
[Wake Forest Baptist Health]
Molecular Diagnostics Lab
Medical Center Boulevard \ Winston-Salem, NC 27157 p 336.716.2109 \ f 336.716.5890 mward <@t> wakehealth.edu
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:16:42 -0400
From: Tom McNemar <TMcNemar <@t> lmhealth.org>
Subject: [Histonet] RE: cell block staining issues
To: 'Martha Ward-Pathology' <mward <@t> wakehealth.edu>,
"histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
<histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID:
<E9A90E28259D2F4E84308C5E8EA8F7B401694CAE1D33 <@t> lmhs-exchange>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
We have not used B72.3 for quite awhile now but all of our NGYNs are either collected in or processed with Cytolyt and we have had no issues. Sorry, I know this isn't much help.
Tom McNemar, HT(ASCP)
Histology Co-ordinator
Licking Memorial Health Systems
(740) 348-4163
(740) 348-4166
tmcnemar <@t> lmhealth.org
www.LMHealth.org
-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Martha Ward-Pathology
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 8:19 AM
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] cell block staining issues
We have something of a mystery here and I am hoping someone can help. My cytopath docs are saying that our B72.3 (TAG-72) antibody is not working well in cell blocks created from fluids (plural), etc. and that this is a fairly recent development (over the past 5-6 weeks or so). The surgical cases we have stained look great as does our control, which is placed on each slide. We have not changed lot numbers of antibody or made any up recently and the antibody is not expired, or even close. The only thing we can find that is different is that cytology has been rinsing the needles out with a product called Cytolyt, instead of saline and they started this around the first of August. Does anyone know if this product could cause any interference with our staining? The docs just say that the tumor cells are not staining and we are sort of at a loss here.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Martha Ward, MT (ASCP) QIHC
Manager
[Wake Forest Baptist Health]
Molecular Diagnostics Lab
Medical Center Boulevard \ Winston-Salem, NC 27157 p 336.716.2109 \ f 336.716.5890 mward <@t> wakehealth.edu
This e-mail, including attachments, is intended for the sole use of the individual and/or entity to whom it is addressed, and contains information from Licking Memorial Health Systems which is confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, nor authorized to receive for the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this e-mail and attachments is prohibited. If you have received this in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message immediately. You may also contact the LMH Process Improvement Center at 740-348-4641. E-mail transmissions cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. Thank you.
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:25:01 +0000
From: Martha Ward-Pathology <mward <@t> wakehealth.edu>
Subject: [Histonet] RE: cell block staining issues
To: Tom McNemar <TMcNemar <@t> lmhealth.org>,
"histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
<histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID:
<B2CECB1B6665A4479056478F6DE3C4AB197EFD73 <@t> exchdb6.medctr.ad.wfubmc.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Well actually it does help because we are trying to eliminate possible causes and it is nice to know that someone else uses Cytolyt with no problems. It is just frustrating because we are doing nothing different that I can find. The next step is to see if the samples are coming from the same doctor/clinic and see if they are doing anything different.
Martha
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom McNemar [mailto:TMcNemar <@t> lmhealth.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 9:17 AM
To: Martha Ward-Pathology; histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: RE: cell block staining issues
We have not used B72.3 for quite awhile now but all of our NGYNs are either collected in or processed with Cytolyt and we have had no issues. Sorry, I know this isn't much help.
Tom McNemar, HT(ASCP)
Histology Co-ordinator
Licking Memorial Health Systems
(740) 348-4163
(740) 348-4166
tmcnemar <@t> lmhealth.org
www.LMHealth.org
-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Martha Ward-Pathology
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 8:19 AM
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] cell block staining issues
We have something of a mystery here and I am hoping someone can help. My cytopath docs are saying that our B72.3 (TAG-72) antibody is not working well in cell blocks created from fluids (plural), etc. and that this is a fairly recent development (over the past 5-6 weeks or so). The surgical cases we have stained look great as does our control, which is placed on each slide. We have not changed lot numbers of antibody or made any up recently and the antibody is not expired, or even close. The only thing we can find that is different is that cytology has been rinsing the needles out with a product called Cytolyt, instead of saline and they started this around the first of August. Does anyone know if this product could cause any interference with our staining? The docs just say that the tumor cells are not staining and we are sort of at a loss here.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Martha Ward, MT (ASCP) QIHC
Manager
[Wake Forest Baptist Health]
Molecular Diagnostics Lab
Medical Center Boulevard \ Winston-Salem, NC 27157 p 336.716.2109 \ f 336.716.5890 mward <@t> wakehealth.edu
This e-mail, including attachments, is intended for the sole use of the individual and/or entity to whom it is addressed, and contains information from Licking Memorial Health Systems which is confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, nor authorized to receive for the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this e-mail and attachments is prohibited. If you have received this in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message immediately. You may also contact the LMH Process Improvement Center at 740-348-4641. E-mail transmissions cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. Thank you.
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:05:28 +0000
From: "O'Donnell, Bill" <billodonnell <@t> catholichealth.net>
Subject: [Histonet] Thermo Slide Mate
To: "histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
<histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID:
<D3FBFE61D75EA84C821F8CB681E7DAFC47519C9C <@t> CHIEX015.CHI.catholichealth.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
A note to vendors -
I am in need of a roll of ink for the Thermo Slide Mate. I am told that our distributer is out and it will be 4-6 weeks wait. This is an unacceptable wait. Who else is making/marketing this product? I will gladly make a trial purchase.
Contact me directly via email bill <@t> deaconbill.com . Please do not post to Histonet - thanks - Bill
William (Bill) O'Donnell, HT (ASCP) QIHC
Senior Histologist
Good Samaritan Hospital
10 East 31st Street
Kearney, NE 68847
SERENITY is not freedom from the storm, but peace amid the storm.
This electronic mail and any attached documents are intended solely for the named addressee(s) and contain confidential information. If you are not an addressee, or responsible for delivering this email to an addressee, you have received this email in error and are notified that reading, copying, or disclosing this email is prohibited. If you received this email in error, immediately reply to the sender and delete the message completely from your computer system.
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:22:47 -0500
From: jerry sedgewick <jerrysedgewick <@t> gmail.com>
Subject: [Histonet] 6 biggest problems with color brightfield images
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Message-ID: <527275C7.40403 <@t> gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Just in case you're interested, I have written an easy-to-follow guide
on 6 problems with color brightfield images, and 6 solutions. See the
posting at a blogsite:
http://color-integrity.com/?p=15
Enjoy,
Jerry Sedgewick
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:24:07 -0500
From: jerry sedgewick <jerrysedgewick <@t> gmail.com>
Subject: [Histonet] 6 biggest problems with color brightfield images
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Message-ID: <52727617.9050108 <@t> gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
The link in the last email was incorrect. Here is the correct link:
http://color-integrity.com/?p=61
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:56:05 -0400
From: Hans B Snyder <hans <@t> histologistics.com>
Subject: [Histonet] StainMate Stainer
To: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Message-ID:
<CAAYBjcuHRozYXd9jQ+BQXQYsfBygr87qnc09coGJ4Ya=4co8fA <@t> mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hello,
Does anyone know if the Stainmate stainer can be programed with 50 steps or
more? I have looking to buy one but need it for a purpose other than
cytology and histology. It needs to be have 50 steps or more for this
application.
Thank you
Hans B Snyder
Histologistics
60 Prescott Street
Worcester, MA 01605
508-308-7800
hans <@t> histologistics.com <haqns <@t> histologistics.com>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
End of Histonet Digest, Vol 119, Issue 35
*****************************************
More information about the Histonet
mailing list