[Histonet] Specimen Tracking Systems

Fri Nov 1 10:17:38 CDT 2013

I completely agree w/ Jesus and Tim. It is way to difficult to connect our data and move Anatomic Pathology to a level plane w/ the rest of Healthcare. We need to demand from our vendors systems that will to allow us seamless integration and communication of our data. Too often, the solutions for AP are piecemealed together, proprietary and just not up to standard. We need tracking and quality systems that will work with all our equipment and we need equipment that will integrate into all information systems.

As we move to delivery of personalized medicine, AP will become one of the major centers of data and information and we cannot afford to spend the time and effort to recreate the wheel every time a lab wants to connect. The technology upgrade we need in AP is tried and true, even old, technology. We need this upgrade now. We need an overhaul of the equipment and processes in AP and we must demand new and useful innovation if we are to meet the demands of the ever changing Healthcare market.

I also hope more individuals share their experiences at all the professional societies. We need the vendors to hear of the need from the technical, professional and patient perspectives. We will need to engage w/ our vendors to help them understand our needs. 

William DeSalvo, BS HTL(ASCP)

> From: JEllin <@t> yumaregional.org
> To: Timothy.Morken <@t> ucsfmedctr.org; wdesalvo.cac <@t> outlook.com; mroark <@t> sfmc.net; histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Subject: RE: [Histonet] Specimen Tracking Systems
> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 13:54:16 +0000
> 
> I would like to chime in on this Bill and Tim both gave great examples of what it takes to move in this direction.  But I would also like to understand why there are so many challenges in getting the data back into the APLIS with updates and orders.   I would tell people the biggest concern that I have the data being produced by a system should be accessible across all gradients of the workflow and not just the unique tracking system.  Not only is this tracking system positioned to help out histology with what is being explained below, but it is the foundation work in taking steps to get to the next level when talking Digital Pathology, molecular, Personalized medicine,  Pathologist cockpit, and algorithm analysis.    
> 
> With the looming cuts coming down the pike, we have to make sure the vendors understand we cannot have barriers when it comes to interface and interoperability with our system.  At the same token we cannot be charges an arm, leg and torso for interfacing what is rightfully ours and that is the patients data we produce.
> 
> Bill and Tim excellent job in giving a crash course in Tracking system 101,, I do believe we should see more of this explained at professional societies meeting and also what the new environments we are going to be working in because of this technology.  
> 
> Just my two cents
> 
> Jesus Ellin
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Morken, Timothy
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 3:45 PM
> To: 'WILLIAM DESALVO'; Matthew D. Roark; histonet
> Subject: RE: [Histonet] Specimen Tracking Systems
> 
> I agree with Bill on this. We have Cerner Copath Plus and looked at Cerebro, Vantage and Omnitrax. Only Cerebro and Vantage were capable of working with Copath. But the problem is that Copath requires you purchase their tracking system to use as an HL-7 interface to any third party system. AND there is not two-way communication between the systems. You MUST enter orders (cases, blocks, stains) in copath and it ports orders to the other system. The only feedback is status updates to copath - you cannot add items in the other system and expect them to show up in copath. That requirement effectively doubled the price of the system. So we are using only the Copath AB&T system, which we are starting to implement now. They will finally have touch screen capability in the spring so we were satisfied with that. Touch screens were a primary spec we demanded. 
> 
> The key to tracking is how the tracking system works with your current LIS. Can it communicate in a true bi-directional fashion? Is it just an add on and all the tracking info is in the tracking component, not the LIS? There are tradeoffs and you need to figure out which you want to live with.
> 
> We spent two years investigating all these systems, doing site visits, and going through a 6-month total LEAN evaluation. The one thing every institution told us was: LEAN your system BEFORE adding barcoding.  Barcoding will NOT fix any inefficiencies you have. And you are pretty much stuck with what ever system you barcode - warts and all. So do all the hard work up front. 
> 
> We thought we were prepared but are daily finding all kinds of little details that have to be worked out. Detail out every single little thing about all your workflows before starting anything. Streamline everything.
> 
> Cassette printing is the heart of barcoding. The barcoded (actually usually 2D matrix codes) on the cassette drive grossing, tracking through processing, embedding and cutting. If that does not work reliably your system will not work. 
> 
> We went with Leica cassette printers. They are huge, but fast (5 sec per cass). We were going to use thermo, but they had their printhead problem and we dropped the order. They are 20+ seconds per cassttes, tho have a very compact footprint. You will find there are tradeoffs to everything.
> 
> Slide labeling is the other half of the equation. They must be reliable and survive all histology procedures. 
> 
> We will use thermal transfer label printers rather than direct slide (too expensive- we will have a printer at each microtome- and cumbersome to change out slide types). Slide labeling is a HUGE deal - you have to be sure it works for everything and can be used in your immuno stainers and coverslipping machines. We are using either Brady StainerBondz labels or LabTags Xylituff labels. These were the only ones that had the size we wanted (23 x 19 mm) and survived all processes. General data StainerShield are also good, but only come in 22 x 22 size. Plus are the most expensive.
> 
> You will find it much easier if you use labels and ribbons from one manufacturer, designed to use with specific printers. That simplifies a lot of the effort. We have tried to mix and match but it is very difficult because all manufacturers do not make matching labels and ribbons for all printers. 
> 
> 
> 
> Tim Morken
> Supervisor, Electron Microscopy and Neuromuscular Special Studies UC San Francisco Medical Center San Francisco, CA
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of WILLIAM DESALVO
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 3:01 PM
> To: Matthew D. Roark; histonet
> Subject: RE: [Histonet] Specimen Tracking Systems
> 
> My lab chose the Ventana Vantage System w/ Thermo PrintMate cassette printers. We are a multi-location system and Vantage works well for us. We wanted a robust tracking and flexible quality assurance system and Ventana provided what we needed and wanted.
>  
> I suggest you look at the big four to start your evaluation:
> Ventana - Vantage
> Leica- Cerebro
> Thermo- OmniTrax
> General Data - HTS
>  
> The larger companies have more interfaces built for the different LIS used in Histology. There are many smaller companies that offer tracking systems, but make sure they can connect w/ your LIS.  After product selection, support is critical.
>  
> Sunquest and Cerner Millennium now offer tracking and quality assurance modules. And I imagine there are other tracking systems built into more LIS.
>  
> You will also want to evaluate multiple printers for your cassettes. Always keep in mind the amount of information you will be adding to the cassette a this will reduce the number of cassettes/ minute. Start w/ the tracking system vendor and see what the have validated. Consider the upkeep and maintenance of the printer. We choose heat transfer, but there are Laser and Ink-jet that work really well. We chose to point of generation and wanted a very small footprint to place the printers in the grossing stations.
>  
> We also choose not to use a slide printing system and decided the bar coded labels at microtomy was the best solution for us. We wanted less maintenance and steady throughput. Easier to load a roll of labels than keeping a printer up and running.
>  
> Last, but certainly not least, support. You will need a ton of support to work through this project: interfaces, IT upgrades, software adjustments, WORKFLOW changes and training. Plan and re-plan before you make your selection. And negotiate hard, the pricing is all over the place for the systems.   
>  
> 
> William DeSalvo, BS HTL(ASCP)
> Production Manager-Anatomic Pathology
> Chair, NSH Quality Management Committee
> Board Member, Digital Pathology Association Owner/Consultant, Collaborative Advantage Consulting
> 
>  
> > From: mroark <@t> sfmc.net
> > To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> > Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 20:21:47 +0000
> > Subject: [Histonet] Specimen Tracking Systems
> > 
> > What systems are people using for specimen tracking?  I'm looking for the whole package of cassette printers, work station slide printers, tracking software, etc...
> > 
> > Any help and recommendations would be appreciated!
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Matthew Roark- HT/HTL(ASCP)CM
> > Histology Specialist
> > Saint Francis Medical Center
> > 211 Saint Francis Drive
> > Cape Girardeau, MO 63703
> > 573-331-3982
> > mroark <@t> sfmc.net<mailto:mroark <@t> sfmc.net>
> > http://www.sfmc.net<http://www.sfmc.net/>
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Histonet mailing list
> > Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> > http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>  		 	   		  _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This message is confidential, intended only for the named 
> recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged 
> or exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you are 
> not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that the 
> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is 
> strictly prohibited.  If you receive this message in error, 
> or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender 
> at either the e-mail, fax, address, or telephone number 
> listed above and delete this e-mail from your computer. 
> Thank You.
> ______________________________________________________________________