[Histonet] question
joelle weaver
joelleweaver <@t> hotmail.com
Thu Mar 21 07:10:31 CDT 2013
I guess I didn't understand what debris you were speaking of, yes it would only decontaminate what is within the chamber. I guess I never had much issue with any "blowing"
Joelle Weaver MAOM, HTL (ASCP) QIHC
CC: marilyn.a.weiss <@t> kp.org; histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
From: abright <@t> brightinstruments.com
Subject: Re: [Histonet] question
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:25:41 +0000
To: joelleweaver <@t> hotmail.com
I do not see that as UV will not decontaminate areas and tissue that are not in the UV light path or thick tissue.Alan Bright
Sent from my iPhone
On 20 Mar 2013, at 23:38, "joelle weaver" <joelleweaver <@t> hotmail.com> wrote:
Maybe that is why some like the UV decontamination option? I know I prefer it. If there is aerolizing of any material or particles after that cycle, at least it whatever was trapped in the chamber would have been decontaminated when you then vaccum. I think that the UV models have their own vaccum as I recall. Plus it is MUCH faster than the old defrots, wipe out, vaccum and rinse steps and air dry steps needed to decontaminate some ( usually older) cryostats.
Joelle Weaver MAOM, HTL (ASCP) QIHC
> From: abright <@t> brightinstruments.com
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:37:45 +0000
> To: Marilyn.A.Weiss <@t> kp.org
> Subject: Re: [Histonet] question
> CC: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>
> Strange about the gloves when vacuuming out fresh tissue trimmings from cryostats and exhausting the air back into the lab is done.
>
> Alan Bright
>
> On 20 Mar 2013, at 19:07, "Marilyn.A.Weiss <@t> kp.org" <Marilyn.A.Weiss <@t> kp.org> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for your response about the squames and we are all wearing
> > gloves now, if one uses them then we all do is my motto, although in 50
> > years of cutting, this is the first time this has come up. . guess I was
> > lucky. anyway, the same pathologists would like to know if there is a
> > standard about wearing gloves in the histo world and if so, is it because
> > of squames or although the tissue is fixed, is there chances of infections
> > or something else. thank you.
> >
> > NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this
> > e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or
> > disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error,
> > please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently
> > delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or
> > saving them. Thank you.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Histonet mailing list
> > Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> > http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> >
> >
> > --
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
More information about the Histonet
mailing list