[Histonet] standards for embedding
Rene J Buesa
rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com
Mon Mar 4 10:17:57 CST 2013
Ontario standards are above national and international averages and would be difficult to duplicate for the majority of labs.
Your averages are more in accordance with the averages I mention.
Please go to http://www.histosearch.com/rene.html to compare with the results of a survey I published.
René J.
From: Diana McCaig <dmccaig <@t> ckha.on.ca>
To: "'histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu'" <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Sent: Monday, March 4, 2013 11:07 AM
Subject: [Histonet] standards for embedding
I know this topic has been beaten to death in the past and do realize it is dependent on tissue
orientation, quantity of pieces in a block, and experience.
There are guidelines suggested by the College of Med Lab of Ontario in a document Oct 2008
that indicates the expected minimum daily range is
Specimens with no orientation 16-38 seconds per specimen
Specimens with orientation 21 to 52 seconds peer specimen
Mixed cassettes 60-70 per hour
I would like to know if this is monitored and what do you if your techs are unable to reach these recommendations,
even after several years of experience. I realize these are minimum suggestions and should be achievable but what
recommendations are suggested if a tech with over 10 years experience still averages close to 2 minutes a block. On
average we may have 120-140 blocks a day and it takes 3.5-4 hours to embed. I have had ergonomic assessments done.
They seem to maintain a constant level and will not strive for improvement. Any suggestions?
Diana
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
More information about the Histonet
mailing list