[Histonet] Re: Histonet Digest, Vol 117, Issue 2

Casey Arnold carnold <@t> ourlab.net
Thu Aug 1 13:18:32 CDT 2013


RE: Shipping Slides
Check out HeldSecure.com. I know they make great slide storing boxes that
are very reasonable priced. They may have something you are interested in.


On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:02 PM,
<histonet-request <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>wrote:

> Send Histonet mailing list submissions to
>         histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         histonet-request <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         histonet-owner <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Histonet digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. RE: EM tissue processors (Sherwood, Margaret)
>    2. Embedding problems-part 2 (Tim Wheelock)
>    3. patient identifier (Webb, Dorothy L)
>    4. Re: polyomavirus antigen immunostain in urine     cytology
>       specimens (Richard Cartun)
>    5. Re: Shipping Slides (Richard Cartun)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:11:48 +0000
> From: "Sherwood, Margaret" <MSHERWOOD <@t> PARTNERS.ORG>
> Subject: RE: [Histonet] EM tissue processors
> To: 'Tom Strader' <tom <@t> heartlandbiotech.com>,
>         "histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
>         <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
> Message-ID:
>         <16F356143B1CE2459BC129BF68AD0F0F14E53619 <@t> PHSX10MB25.partners.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I haven't done so; usually manually process samples.  But, lately, I have
> a lot of specimens to process for TEM.  Would appreciate you sharing your
> findings with the list.  I might like to think about automation at this
> stage.
>
> Thanks!
> Peggy
>
>
> Peggy Sherwood
> Research Specialist, Photopathology
> Wellman Center for Photomedicine (EDR 214)
> Massachusetts General Hospital
> 50 Blossom Street
> Boston, MA 02114-2696
> 617-724-4839 (voice mail)
> 617-726-6983 (lab)
> 617-726-1206 (fax)
> msherwood <@t> partners.org
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:
> histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Tom Strader
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 12:43 PM
> To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Subject: [Histonet] EM tissue processors
>
> Hi,
> I'm comparing operating costs relative to features/benefits of automatic
> EM tissue processors (e.g. Leica, RMC, Lynx,.) with or without microwave
> and was wondering if anyone else had already done the same. I'd like to
> compare total costs per specimen and relative advantages/disadvantages
> of each system. I'm looking at the cost of consumables, reagents and
> labor separately and am also interested in reliability, efficiency and
> ease-of-use.
> I'd greatly appreciate it if anyone has information they can share.
> Feel free to contact me at the address below if you have questions.
> Thanks!
> Best regards,
> Tom
>
> Thomas E. Strader, MS
> Heartland Biotech | Madison, WI, USA | 608-770-7649 |
> <http://www.heartlandbiotech.com> www.heartlandbiotech.com
> tom.strader <@t> heartlandbiotech.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 12:16:51 -0400
> From: Tim Wheelock <twheelock <@t> mclean.harvard.edu>
> Subject: [Histonet] Embedding problems-part 2
> To: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Message-ID: <51FA89F3.9000001 <@t> mclean.harvard.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hi again Everyone:
>
> Thank you for the suggestions.
> I use the flat end of an old microtome orientation screw as a tamper.
> I hold down the various parts of the specimen for around 5 seconds each,
> but I cannot hold down all areas of the specimen at once, due to the
> small size of the orientation  screw.
> I have found that since brain tissue is so heterogeneous, certain parts
> are more suseptible to lifting than others, and I hold those down longer.
> After I embed the specimen, I put it on the freezing plate, embed a
> couple of more blocks, then top off the first block with a bit more
> paraffin, and so forth.
> Possibly the heat of the extra bit of wax is causing the lifting?
>
> Thanks again
>
> Tim Wheelock
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:37:03 -0500
> From: "Webb, Dorothy L" <Dorothy.L.Webb <@t> HealthPartners.Com>
> Subject: [Histonet] patient identifier
> To: "'histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu'"
>         <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
> Message-ID:
>         <
> 65365F35C0F2EF4D846EC3CA73E49C43029A796FEE46 <@t> HPEMX3.HealthPartners.int>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> According to Joint Commission, the 2 patient identifiers (which they do
> not consider DOB) has to be as the specimen enters the lab.  On the blocks
> and slides, the only identifier needs to be the accession number as long as
> all identifiers are followed throughout the process.  We have all
> information in the LIS system at accessioning as it is on the specimen
> container and req.  As the barcode is generated on the block and slide
> label, the accession number is printed also.  We have been through many
> inspections of all types and agencies and are found complient in this area
> always.  Also, we have a member of one of the JC committees on our AP lab
> staff who keeps us up on all requirements:)
>
>
>
>
>   ________________________________
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
> addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the individual
> responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, please be
> advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use,
> dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly
> prohibited.
>
> If you have received this communication in error, please return it to the
> sender immediately and delete the original message and any copy of it from
> your computer system. If you have any questions concerning this message,
> please contact the sender. Disclaimer R001.0
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:41:27 -0400
> From: Richard Cartun <Rcartun <@t> harthosp.org>
> Subject: Re: [Histonet] polyomavirus antigen immunostain in urine
>         cytology specimens
> To: <Pathrm35 <@t> comcast.net>, <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
> Message-ID: <51FA5777020000770003DED5 <@t> gwmail3.harthosp.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Yes, what would you like to know?
>
> Richard
>
>
> Richard W. Cartun, MS, PhD
> Director, Histology & Immunopathology
> Director, Biospecimen Collection Programs
> Assistant Director, Anatomic Pathology
> Hartford Hospital
> 80 Seymour Street
> Hartford, CT  06102
> (860) 545-1596 Office
> (860) 545-2204 Fax
>
>
> >>> <Pathrm35 <@t> comcast.net> 7/31/2013 11:01 AM >>>
>
>
>
> Fellow techs,
>
>
>
> Does any one have any experience with a immunostain for a polyomavirus
> antigen in urine cytology specimens?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ron
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:59:33 -0400
> From: Richard Cartun <Rcartun <@t> harthosp.org>
> Subject: Re: [Histonet] Shipping Slides
> To: "histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
>         <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>,    Debbie Granato
>         <debgranato <@t> yahoo.com>
> Message-ID: <51FA5BB5020000770003DEDF <@t> gwmail3.harthosp.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> We put our send-out slides in the "5 slide plastic holders" then place
> them in "Jiffylite Sealed Air" cushioned mailers (there are different sizes
> available).  If we are sending out a large quantity of slides we will use
> FedEx's "Padded Pak", but it will cost more than a FedEx envelope.
>
> Richard
>
>
> Richard W. Cartun, MS, PhD
> Director, Histology & Immunopathology
> Director, Biospecimen Collection Programs
> Assistant Director, Anatomic Pathology
> Hartford Hospital
> 80 Seymour Street
> Hartford, CT  06102
> (860) 545-1596 Office
> (860) 545-2204 Fax
>
>
> >>> Debbie Granato <debgranato <@t> yahoo.com> 7/31/2013 11:04 AM >>>
> Good Morning!
>
> Can anyone tell me the best way that you have found to ship slides by Fed
> Ex?
> I need to send several cases out and want the safest way possible to
> eliminate broken slides.
> We have tried plastic slide boxes with gauze for cushioning and then taped
> shut and a few other ways. Are there special transport slide containers,
> other than the 5 slide holders.
> Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
>
> Thank you,
> Debbie Granato HT(ASCP)
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>
> End of Histonet Digest, Vol 117, Issue 2
> ****************************************
>



-- 
 NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are
intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.
The message, together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or
privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving,
copying, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by
reply email and delete all copies.

Thank you
*Casey Arnold
*
*Histology Supervisor**
OURLabs / OPKO Diagnostics, LLC*
1450 Elm Hill Pike
Nashville, TN 37210
Direct: 615-345-4582
Office: 615-874-0410
Fax:  615-345-4595


More information about the Histonet mailing list