[Histonet] RE: Histonet Digest, Vol 107, Issue 31

Ciolkosz, Maribeth J Maribeth.Ciolkosz <@t> allina.com
Thu Oct 25 11:22:29 CDT 2012


I would also be interested in the articles if you can send them.  grmtgrl <@t> gmail.com

Maribeth Ciolkosz
Lab Manager * Pathology * Allina Health Laboratory
Phone: 612-863-1588 * Pager: 612-654-2952 * Fax: 612-863-0550 * Maribeth.ciolkosz <@t> allina.com
Mail Route 20203 * 2800 10th Ave South, Suite 2000 * Minneapolis, MN 55407


-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of histonet-request <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:30 AM
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Histonet Digest, Vol 107, Issue 31

Send Histonet mailing list submissions to
	histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	histonet-request <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
	histonet-owner <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Histonet digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: CD31 for FFPE IHC on Mouse (Kim Merriam)
   2. Number of blocks  (Dorothy Ragland-Glass)
   3. RE: Number of blocks  (Mike Pence)
   4. RE: Number of blocks  (Bartlett, Jeanine (CDC/OID/NCEZID))
   5. RE: Number of blocks (Dorothy Ragland-Glass)
   6. Re: Number of blocks  (Rene J Buesa)
   7. RE: Number of blocks (Brendal Finlay)
   8. RE: Number of blocks (Rathborne, Toni)
   9. RE: Number of blocks  (Hannen, Valerie)
  10. Re: Number of blocks  (Will Chappell)
  11. Histology Supervisor Opening (Jessica-Prometheus)
  12. Re: Number of blocks  (Rene J Buesa)
  13. RE: Number of blocks  (Edwards, Richard E.)
  14. Re: Number of blocks (Davide Costanzo)
  15. RE: Number of blocks  (Nails, Felton)
  16. Re: Number of blocks (Rene J Buesa)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 04:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kim Merriam <kmerriam2003 <@t> yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Histonet] CD31 for FFPE IHC on Mouse
To: Patsy Ruegg <pruegg <@t> ihctech.net>, 'Mark Elliott'
	<Mark.Elliott <@t> hli.ubc.ca>,	"histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
	<histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID:
	<1351164318.20147.YahooMailNeo <@t> web121903.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

I second the Dianova antibody - we have had very good luck with it.? Standard citrate HIER works for us.
?


Kim Merriam, MA, HT(ASCP)QIHC
Cambridge, MA
 

________________________________
 From: Patsy Ruegg <pruegg <@t> ihctech.net>
To: 'Mark Elliott' <Mark.Elliott <@t> hli.ubc.ca>; histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 11:20 AM
Subject: RE: [Histonet] CD31 for FFPE IHC on Mouse
  
Rat anti mouse cd31 from Dionova is the way to go it is better than all the
others.

Patsy Ruegg, HT(ASCP)QIHC
Ruegg IHC Consulting, LLC
40864 Arkansas Ave
Bennett, CO 80102
Phone: 303-644-4538
Fax: 720-859-4110
pruegg <@t> ihctech.net
-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Mark Elliott
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 3:45 PM
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] CD31 for FFPE IHC on Mouse

Amy
Can you please share the responses you got with the rest of us
Thanks
Mark


Message: 8
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:21:55 -0400
From: "Amy Porter" <portera <@t> msu.edu>
Subject: RE: [Histonet] CD31 for FFPE Immunohistochemistry on Mouse
Model
To: "'Amy Porter'" <portera <@t> msu.edu>,"'Histonet'"
<histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID: <003101cdad6e$3792fc80$a6b8f580$@edu>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="US-ASCII"

Thanks to all for responses......looks like most roads lead to once place
which is spectacular!!? Just what I needed.? Amy

-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Amy Porter
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 3:36 PM
To: 'Histonet'
Subject: [Histonet] CD31 for FFPE Immunohistochemistry on Mouse Model

Anyone out there have CD31 working well on FFPE samples for Mouse Samples??
I know this might be a long shot, however I haven't looked for anything on
this in quite awhile.



Amy S. Porter, HT(ASCP) QIHC

Michigan State University

Investigative HistoPathology Laboratory

William S. Spielman, Ph.D. - Director

Patricia K. Senagore, M.D. - Consulting Pathologist

Department of Physiology / Human Pathology

Biomedical Physical Sciences Building 

567 Wilson Road - Room 2133

East Lansing, MI? 48824-3320

Phone:? 517-884-5026

Fax:? 517-432-1368

portera <@t> msu.edu

http://www.humanpathology.msu.edu/




***CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE***
This electronic message and any attachments are intended only for the use of
the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and
confidential.? Any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication by unauthorized individuals is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify the sender
immediately by reply e-mail and delete the original and all copies from your
system.

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:38:26 -0400
From: Dorothy Ragland-Glass <techmana12 <@t> yahoo.com>
Subject: [Histonet] Number of blocks 
To: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Message-ID: <cpin2s9oqsejfsv7q2x9ciyn.1351082306522 <@t> email.android.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

It was annouced by a histo lab manager that techs are expected to cut 40-50 blocks per hour. That seems to me to be rather high. I don't see quality slides being turned out. It is quantity and profit above patient care. I am old school, and I remember something about quality and patient first. Besides  what kind of impact on morality of the techs, back problems and carpal tunnel syndrom is laying ahead for the cutter after cranking the microtome repeatedly that many blocks without a break.

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 07:50:20 -0500
From: "Mike Pence" <mpence <@t> grhs.net>
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Number of blocks 
To: "Dorothy Ragland-Glass" <techmana12 <@t> yahoo.com>,
	<Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID:
	<661949901A768E4F9CC16D8AF8F2838C03974EFA <@t> is-e2k3.grhs.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="US-ASCII"

As a histo lab supervisor I would never ask nor demand that my techs do
something that I cannot do myself. I would have to say that that number
sounds a little high to me, but it would depend on the type of specimens
being cut.

Just my thought, Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Dorothy
Ragland-Glass
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 7:38 AM
To: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Number of blocks 


It was annouced by a histo lab manager that techs are expected to cut
40-50 blocks per hour. That seems to me to be rather high. I don't see
quality slides being turned out. It is quantity and profit above patient
care. I am old school, and I remember something about quality and
patient first. Besides  what kind of impact on morality of the techs,
back problems and carpal tunnel syndrom is laying ahead for the cutter
after cranking the microtome repeatedly that many blocks without a
break.




------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:53:00 +0000
From: "Bartlett, Jeanine (CDC/OID/NCEZID)" <jqb7 <@t> cdc.gov>
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Number of blocks 
To: Mike Pence <mpence <@t> grhs.net>, Dorothy Ragland-Glass
	<techmana12 <@t> yahoo.com>, "Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
	<Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID:
	<DF1CBA3D83D9A344A7D6A045188E448433A25B90 <@t> EMBX-CLFT1.cdc.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Absolutely!  40-50 bone marrows is completely different from 40-50 fallopian tubes.  Are you just cutting one section per block?

Jeanine H. Bartlett
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Infectious Diseases Pathology Branch
404-639-3590
jeanine.bartlett <@t> cdc.hhs.gov

-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Mike Pence
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 8:50 AM
To: Dorothy Ragland-Glass; Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Number of blocks 

As a histo lab supervisor I would never ask nor demand that my techs do something that I cannot do myself. I would have to say that that number sounds a little high to me, but it would depend on the type of specimens being cut.

Just my thought, Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Dorothy Ragland-Glass
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 7:38 AM
To: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Number of blocks 


It was annouced by a histo lab manager that techs are expected to cut
40-50 blocks per hour. That seems to me to be rather high. I don't see quality slides being turned out. It is quantity and profit above patient care. I am old school, and I remember something about quality and patient first. Besides  what kind of impact on morality of the techs, back problems and carpal tunnel syndrom is laying ahead for the cutter after cranking the microtome repeatedly that many blocks without a break.


_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:10:20 -0400
From: Dorothy Ragland-Glass <techmana12 <@t> yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Number of blocks
To: "Bartlett, Jeanine (CDC/OID/NCEZID)" <jqb7 <@t> cdc.gov>, Mike Pence
	<mpence <@t> grhs.net>, "Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu	"
	<Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID: <it5r04vgts0gfhsdljox5wv1.1351174220641 <@t> email.android.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

No. My main duty is Ihc, but I heard the other techs, mostly the ones new to histology and some older techs who informed them on how obsurd and impossible that task would be for them to try to live up to that standard. The newbees thought that was what the speed of a histotech should be. They were told it did not matter what the tissue was accordding to CAP. Us older techs know different. But we need written documentation to show the young turks who are being bullied.  Is there something to written to give them a leg to stand up.

"Bartlett, Jeanine (CDC/OID/NCEZID)" <jqb7 <@t> cdc.gov> wrote:

>Absolutely!  40-50 bone marrows is completely different from 40-50 fallopian tubes.  Are you just cutting one section per block?
>
>Jeanine H. Bartlett
>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
>Infectious Diseases Pathology Branch
>404-639-3590
>jeanine.bartlett <@t> cdc.hhs.gov
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Mike Pence
>Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 8:50 AM
>To: Dorothy Ragland-Glass; Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>Subject: RE: [Histonet] Number of blocks 
>
>As a histo lab supervisor I would never ask nor demand that my techs do something that I cannot do myself. I would have to say that that number sounds a little high to me, but it would depend on the type of specimens being cut.
>
>Just my thought, Mike
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Dorothy Ragland-Glass
>Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 7:38 AM
>To: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>Subject: [Histonet] Number of blocks 
>
>
>It was annouced by a histo lab manager that techs are expected to cut
>40-50 blocks per hour. That seems to me to be rather high. I don't see quality slides being turned out. It is quantity and profit above patient care. I am old school, and I remember something about quality and patient first. Besides  what kind of impact on morality of the techs, back problems and carpal tunnel syndrom is laying ahead for the cutter after cranking the microtome repeatedly that many blocks without a break.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Histonet mailing list
>Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 07:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rene J Buesa <rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Number of blocks 
To: Dorothy Ragland-Glass <techmana12 <@t> yahoo.com>,
	"Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
	<Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID:
	<1351174670.47517.YahooMailNeo <@t> web163102.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Hi Dorothy:
Your manager is wrong and probably influenced by some "productivity consultant" trying to "appear tough" or preparing to justiffy a staff reduction.
The average sectioning productivity obtained in 325 histology laboratories (221?in the US and 114 in 24 foreign countries) is 24 blocks per hour.
Under separate cover I am sending two articles dealing with this issue and that of staffing that you will be able to show to your manager.
Ren? J.


________________________________
From: Dorothy Ragland-Glass <techmana12 <@t> yahoo.com>
To: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 8:38 AM
Subject: [Histonet] Number of blocks 

It was annouced by a histo lab manager that techs are expected to cut 40-50 blocks per hour. That seems to me to be rather high. I don't see quality slides being turned out. It is quantity and profit above patient care. I am old school, and I remember something about quality and patient first. Besides? what kind of impact on morality of the techs, back problems and carpal tunnel syndrom is laying ahead for the cutter after cranking the microtome repeatedly that many blocks without a break.
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:20:44 -0500
From: "Brendal Finlay" <brendal.finlay <@t> medicalcenterclinic.com>
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Number of blocks
To: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
	<Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID: <8886a44369c1fc4c5a9a3de25eefe833 <@t> medicalcenterclinic.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"


Many years ago in histology training at AFIP, we were taught that the
"quota" was 30 blocks an hour.?? As someone stated before, certain
tissue types are easy to cut and are 1-2 sections per slide making
that 40-50 block/hr rate a bit reasonable. When you're leveling
prostates, skins,??cutting specials or unstained, working with dry,
difficult, or fatty tissue, slide turn out time is increased.??


I remember recently seeing someone talking about cutting 80 blocks/hr
and the folks I work with could see the multiple question marks above
my head because that seems impossible to me??at less than 30 seconds
per block.?? No offense to anyone who can do this.?? More power to
you!


I looked in a few histology books, but could not find a written
reference on how "fast" a tech should cut.?? Consistent, good sections
placed on the slide in a neat manner should also be factored into the
equation.


*hops off soapbox*


Brendal C.Finlay, HT (ASCP)

-----Original message-----
From: Dorothy Ragland-Glass techmana12 <@t> yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:10:20 -0500
To: "Bartlett, Jeanine (CDC/OID/NCEZID)" jqb7 <@t> cdc.gov, Mike
Pencempence <@t> grhs.net, "Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
"Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Number of blocks

> No. My main duty is Ihc, but I heard the other techs, mostly the
ones new to histology and some older techs who informed them on how
obsurd and impossible that task would be for them to try to live up to
that standard. The newbees thought that was what the speed of a
histotech should be. They were told it did not matter what the tissue
was accordding to CAP. Us older techs know different. But we need
written documentation to show the young turks who are being bullied.
Is there something to written to give them a leg to stand up.
> 
> "Bartlett, Jeanine (CDC/OID/NCEZID)"wrote:
> 
> >Absolutely! 40-50 bone marrows is completely different from 40-50
fallopian tubes. Are you just cutting one section per block?
> >
> >Jeanine H. Bartlett
> >Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
> >Infectious Diseases Pathology Branch
> >404-639-3590
> >jeanine.bartlett <@t> cdc.hhs.gov
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Mike
Pence
> >Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 8:50 AM
> >To: Dorothy Ragland-Glass; Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> >Subject: RE: [Histonet] Number of blocks 
> >
> >As a histo lab supervisor I would never ask nor demand that my
techs do something that I cannot do myself. I would have to say that
that number sounds a little high to me, but it woulddepend on the type
of specimens being cut.
> >
> >Just my thought, Mike
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> >[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of
Dorothy Ragland-Glass
> >Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 7:38 AM
> >To: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> >Subject: [Histonet] Number of blocks 
> >
> >
> >It was annouced by a histo lab manager that techs are expected to
cut
> >40-50 blocks per hour. That seems to me to be rather high. I don't
see quality slides being turned out. It is quantity and profit above
patient care. I am old school, and I remember something about quality
and patient first. Besides what kind of impact on morality of the
techs, back problems and carpal tunnel syndrom is laying ahead for the
cutter after cranking the microtome repeatedly thatmany blocks without
a break.
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Histonet mailing list
> >Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> >http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> 





------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:26:30 +0000
From: "Rathborne, Toni" <trathborne <@t> somerset-healthcare.com>
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Number of blocks
To: Brendal Finlay <brendal.finlay <@t> medicalcenterclinic.com>,
	"Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
	<Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID:
	<3AD061FE740D464FAC7BF6B5CFB757071353DC01 <@t> smcmail02.somerset-healthcare.com>
	
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Although almost 20 years ago, the reference lab I worked in had similar expectations. They also had no idea that GARBAGE IN= GARBAGE OUT, and we had an unusually high number of recuts.  Smaller sections in the cassette or longer fixation would have reduced that number.

-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Brendal Finlay
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:21 AM
To: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Number of blocks


Many years ago in histology training at AFIP, we were taught that the "quota" was 30 blocks an hour.?? As someone stated before, certain tissue types are easy to cut and are 1-2 sections per slide making that 40-50 block/hr rate a bit reasonable. When you're leveling prostates, skins,??cutting specials or unstained, working with dry, difficult, or fatty tissue, slide turn out time is increased.??


I remember recently seeing someone talking about cutting 80 blocks/hr and the folks I work with could see the multiple question marks above my head because that seems impossible to me??at less than 30 seconds per block.?? No offense to anyone who can do this.?? More power to you!


I looked in a few histology books, but could not find a written reference on how "fast" a tech should cut.?? Consistent, good sections placed on the slide in a neat manner should also be factored into the equation.


*hops off soapbox*


Brendal C.Finlay, HT (ASCP)

-----Original message-----
From: Dorothy Ragland-Glass techmana12 <@t> yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:10:20 -0500
To: "Bartlett, Jeanine (CDC/OID/NCEZID)" jqb7 <@t> cdc.gov, Mike Pencempence <@t> grhs.net, "Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
"Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Number of blocks

> No. My main duty is Ihc, but I heard the other techs, mostly the
ones new to histology and some older techs who informed them on how obsurd and impossible that task would be for them to try to live up to that standard. The newbees thought that was what the speed of a histotech should be. They were told it did not matter what the tissue was accordding to CAP. Us older techs know different. But we need written documentation to show the young turks who are being bullied.
Is there something to written to give them a leg to stand up.
> 
> "Bartlett, Jeanine (CDC/OID/NCEZID)"wrote:
> 
> >Absolutely! 40-50 bone marrows is completely different from 40-50
fallopian tubes. Are you just cutting one section per block?
> >
> >Jeanine H. Bartlett
> >Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Infectious Diseases 
> >Pathology Branch
> >404-639-3590
> >jeanine.bartlett <@t> cdc.hhs.gov
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Mike Pence
> >Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 8:50 AM
> >To: Dorothy Ragland-Glass; Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> >Subject: RE: [Histonet] Number of blocks
> >
> >As a histo lab supervisor I would never ask nor demand that my
techs do something that I cannot do myself. I would have to say that that number sounds a little high to me, but it woulddepend on the type of specimens being cut.
> >
> >Just my thought, Mike
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> >[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of
Dorothy Ragland-Glass
> >Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 7:38 AM
> >To: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> >Subject: [Histonet] Number of blocks
> >
> >
> >It was annouced by a histo lab manager that techs are expected to
cut
> >40-50 blocks per hour. That seems to me to be rather high. I don't
see quality slides being turned out. It is quantity and profit above patient care. I am old school, and I remember something about quality and patient first. Besides what kind of impact on morality of the techs, back problems and carpal tunnel syndrom is laying ahead for the cutter after cranking the microtome repeatedly thatmany blocks without a break.
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Histonet mailing list
> >Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> >http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> 



_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:33:26 -0400
From: "Hannen, Valerie" <Valerie.Hannen <@t> parrishmed.com>
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Number of blocks 
To: 'Rene J Buesa' <rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com>, Dorothy Ragland-Glass
	<techmana12 <@t> yahoo.com>, "Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
	<Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID: <450B7A81EDA0C54E97C53D60F00776C323163BDA42 <@t> isexstore03>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Rene,

I have been asked in the past about productivity in our department. Can you share those articles with me as well?

Thanks!!

Valerie

Valerie A. Hannen, MLT(ASCP),HTL,SU(FL)
Histology Section Chief
Parrish Medical Center
951 N. Washington Ave.
Titusville, Florida 32976
Phone:(321) 268-6333 ext. 7506
Fax: (321) 268-6149
valerie.hannen <@t> parrishmed.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Rene J Buesa
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:18 AM
To: Dorothy Ragland-Glass; Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Number of blocks 

Hi Dorothy:
Your manager is wrong and probably influenced by some "productivity consultant" trying to "appear tough" or preparing to justiffy a staff reduction.
The average sectioning productivity obtained in 325 histology laboratories (221?in the US and 114 in 24 foreign countries) is 24 blocks per hour.
Under separate cover I am sending two articles dealing with this issue and that of staffing that you will be able to show to your manager.
Ren? J.


________________________________
From: Dorothy Ragland-Glass <techmana12 <@t> yahoo.com>
To: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 8:38 AM
Subject: [Histonet] Number of blocks 

It was annouced by a histo lab manager that techs are expected to cut 40-50 blocks per hour. That seems to me to be rather high. I don't see quality slides being turned out. It is quantity and profit above patient care. I am old school, and I remember something about quality and patient first. Besides? what kind of impact on morality of the techs, back problems and carpal tunnel syndrom is laying ahead for the cutter after cranking the microtome repeatedly that many blocks without a break.
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

===================
"This email is intended solely for the use of the individual to
whom it is addressed and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure
under applicable law. If the reader of this email is not the
intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately
delete this message. Thank you"
===================



------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 07:37:44 -0700
From: Will Chappell <chapcl <@t> yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Number of blocks 
To: "Hannen, Valerie" <Valerie.Hannen <@t> parrishmed.com>
Cc: "Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
	<Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID: <55853F69-2E3B-4C78-B048-380ECA29A404 <@t> yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset=utf-8

In fact, can you share them with all of histonet?

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 25, 2012, at 7:33 AM, "Hannen, Valerie" <Valerie.Hannen <@t> parrishmed.com> wrote:

> Rene,
> 
> I have been asked in the past about productivity in our department. Can you share those articles with me as well?
> 
> Thanks!!
> 
> Valerie
> 
> Valerie A. Hannen, MLT(ASCP),HTL,SU(FL)
> Histology Section Chief
> Parrish Medical Center
> 951 N. Washington Ave.
> Titusville, Florida 32976
> Phone:(321) 268-6333 ext. 7506
> Fax: (321) 268-6149
> valerie.hannen <@t> parrishmed.com
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Rene J Buesa
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:18 AM
> To: Dorothy Ragland-Glass; Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Subject: Re: [Histonet] Number of blocks 
> 
> Hi Dorothy:
> Your manager is wrong and probably influenced by some "productivity consultant" trying to "appear tough" or preparing to justiffy a staff reduction.
> The average sectioning productivity obtained in 325 histology laboratories (221 in the US and 114 in 24 foreign countries) is 24 blocks per hour.
> Under separate cover I am sending two articles dealing with this issue and that of staffing that you will be able to show to your manager.
> Ren?? J.
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Dorothy Ragland-Glass <techmana12 <@t> yahoo.com>
> To: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 8:38 AM
> Subject: [Histonet] Number of blocks 
> 
> It was annouced by a histo lab manager that techs are expected to cut 40-50 blocks per hour. That seems to me to be rather high. I don't see quality slides being turned out. It is quantity and profit above patient care. I am old school, and I remember something about quality and patient first. Besides  what kind of impact on morality of the techs, back problems and carpal tunnel syndrom is laying ahead for the cutter after cranking the microtome repeatedly that many blocks without a break.
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> 
> ======================================
> "This email is intended solely for the use of the individual to
> whom it is addressed and may contain information that is
> privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure
> under applicable law. If the reader of this email is not the
> intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
> delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please immediately
> delete this message. Thank you"
> ======================================
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



------------------------------

Message: 11
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:38:44 -0400
From: "Jessica-Prometheus" <jessica <@t> prometheushealthcare.com>
Subject: [Histonet] Histology Supervisor Opening
To: <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID: <021e01cdb2be$6fef8170$4fce8450$@prometheushealthcare.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

Hey Histonet!

 

Prometheus Healthcare is on the search for a Histology Supervisor for a
hospital in Connecticut! The ideal candidate will be HTL (ASCP), have at
least 3 years of leadership experience and about ten years of histology
experience. If you are interested, or know anyone who might be, please
contact me at the information below. Thank you!

 

Jessica Sanchez

Account Manager 

Prometheus Healthcare 

Office 301-693-9057

Fax 301-368-2478

 <mailto:jessica <@t> prometheushealthcare.com> jessica <@t> prometheushealthcare.com

 <http://www.prometheushealthcare.com/> www.prometheushealthcare.com

 <http://twitter.com/PrometheusBlog> http://twitter.com/PrometheusBlog

 <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxkF54CRhLc> Click Here to Meet Me!

 

 



------------------------------

Message: 12
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 07:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rene J Buesa <rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Number of blocks 
To: Will Chappell <chapcl <@t> yahoo.com>,	"Hannen, Valerie"
	<Valerie.Hannen <@t> parrishmed.com>
Cc: "Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
	<Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID:
	<1351177172.71724.YahooMailNeo <@t> web163105.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Will: 
I would like to do that very much but unfortunately Histonet is set in a way that they do not accept atttachments and any e-mail with them will not go through.
Ren? J.


________________________________
From: Will Chappell <chapcl <@t> yahoo.com>
To: "Hannen, Valerie" <Valerie.Hannen <@t> parrishmed.com> 
Cc: Rene J Buesa <rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com>; Dorothy Ragland-Glass <techmana12 <@t> yahoo.com>; "Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu" <Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu> 
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Number of blocks 

In fact, can you share them with all of histonet?

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 25, 2012, at 7:33 AM, "Hannen, Valerie" <Valerie.Hannen <@t> parrishmed.com> wrote:

> Rene,
> 
> I have been asked in the past about productivity in our department. Can you share those articles with me as well?
> 
> Thanks!!
> 
> Valerie
> 
> Valerie A. Hannen, MLT(ASCP),HTL,SU(FL)
> Histology Section Chief
> Parrish Medical Center
> 951 N. Washington Ave.
> Titusville, Florida 32976
> Phone:(321) 268-6333 ext. 7506
> Fax: (321) 268-6149
> valerie.hannen <@t> parrishmed.com
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Rene J Buesa
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:18 AM
> To: Dorothy Ragland-Glass; Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Subject: Re: [Histonet] Number of blocks 
> 
> Hi Dorothy:
> Your manager is wrong and probably influenced by some "productivity consultant" trying to "appear tough" or preparing to justiffy a staff reduction.
> The average sectioning productivity obtained in 325 histology laboratories (221 in the US and 114 in 24 foreign countries) is 24 blocks per hour.
> Under separate cover I am sending two articles dealing with this issue and that of staffing that you will be able to show to your manager.
> Ren? J.
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Dorothy Ragland-Glass <techmana12 <@t> yahoo.com>
> To: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 8:38 AM
> Subject: [Histonet] Number of blocks 
> 
> It was annouced by a histo lab manager that techs are expected to cut 40-50 blocks per hour. That seems to me to be rather high. I don't see quality slides being turned out. It is quantity and profit above patient care. I am old school, and I remember something about quality and patient first. Besides? what kind of impact on morality of the techs, back problems and carpal tunnel syndrom is laying ahead for the cutter after cranking the microtome repeatedly that many blocks without a break.
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> 
> ======================================
> "This email is intended solely for the use of the individual to
> whom it is addressed and may contain information that is
> privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure
> under applicable law. If the reader of this email is not the
> intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
> delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please immediately
> delete this message. Thank you"
> ======================================
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

------------------------------

Message: 13
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:02:28 +0100
From: "Edwards, Richard E." <ree3 <@t> leicester.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Number of blocks 
To: 'Rene J Buesa' <rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com>, Will Chappell
	<chapcl <@t> yahoo.com>,	"Hannen, Valerie" <Valerie.Hannen <@t> parrishmed.com>
Cc: "Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
	<Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID:
	<7722595275A4DD4FA225B92CDBF174A101A6AF65C57E <@t> EXC-MBX3.cfs.le.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

If you  don't mind me butting here  in Rene, most of your papers are  available in full on Pubmed.

                                                    Cheers


                                                                                  Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Rene J Buesa
Sent: 25 October 2012 16:00
To: Will Chappell; Hannen, Valerie
Cc: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Number of blocks 

Will: 
I would like to do that very much but unfortunately Histonet is set in a way that they do not accept atttachments and any e-mail with them will not go through.
Ren? J.


________________________________
From: Will Chappell <chapcl <@t> yahoo.com>
To: "Hannen, Valerie" <Valerie.Hannen <@t> parrishmed.com>
Cc: Rene J Buesa <rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com>; Dorothy Ragland-Glass <techmana12 <@t> yahoo.com>; "Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu" <Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Number of blocks 

In fact, can you share them with all of histonet?

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 25, 2012, at 7:33 AM, "Hannen, Valerie" <Valerie.Hannen <@t> parrishmed.com> wrote:

> Rene,
> 
> I have been asked in the past about productivity in our department. Can you share those articles with me as well?
> 
> Thanks!!
> 
> Valerie
> 
> Valerie A. Hannen, MLT(ASCP),HTL,SU(FL) Histology Section Chief 
> Parrish Medical Center
> 951 N. Washington Ave.
> Titusville, Florida 32976
> Phone:(321) 268-6333 ext. 7506
> Fax: (321) 268-6149
> valerie.hannen <@t> parrishmed.com
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
> [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Rene J 
> Buesa
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:18 AM
> To: Dorothy Ragland-Glass; Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Subject: Re: [Histonet] Number of blocks
> 
> Hi Dorothy:
> Your manager is wrong and probably influenced by some "productivity consultant" trying to "appear tough" or preparing to justiffy a staff reduction.
> The average sectioning productivity obtained in 325 histology laboratories (221 in the US and 114 in 24 foreign countries) is 24 blocks per hour.
> Under separate cover I am sending two articles dealing with this issue and that of staffing that you will be able to show to your manager.
> Ren? J.
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Dorothy Ragland-Glass <techmana12 <@t> yahoo.com>
> To: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 8:38 AM
> Subject: [Histonet] Number of blocks
> 
> It was annouced by a histo lab manager that techs are expected to cut 40-50 blocks per hour. That seems to me to be rather high. I don't see quality slides being turned out. It is quantity and profit above patient care. I am old school, and I remember something about quality and patient first. Besides? what kind of impact on morality of the techs, back problems and carpal tunnel syndrom is laying ahead for the cutter after cranking the microtome repeatedly that many blocks without a break.
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> 
> ======================================
> "This email is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom 
> it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, 
> confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. 
> If the reader of this email is not the intended recipient or the 
> employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the 
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
> distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. 
> If you have received this communication in error, please immediately 
> delete this message. Thank you"
> ======================================
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



------------------------------

Message: 14
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:04:04 -0700
From: Davide Costanzo <pathlocums <@t> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Number of blocks
To: Rene J Buesa <rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com>
Cc: "Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
	<Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID: <5701166409575167709 <@t> unknownmsgid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Can we get a mailing list for these files? I would love to see these
articles as well. DCostanzo <@t> pathmdlabs.com

Thanks Rene

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 25, 2012, at 8:00 AM, Rene J Buesa <rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com> wrote:

> Will:
> I would like to do that very much but unfortunately Histonet is set in a way that they do not accept atttachments and any e-mail with them will not go through.
> Ren? J.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Will Chappell <chapcl <@t> yahoo.com>
> To: "Hannen, Valerie" <Valerie.Hannen <@t> parrishmed.com>
> Cc: Rene J Buesa <rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com>; Dorothy Ragland-Glass <techmana12 <@t> yahoo.com>; "Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu" <Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [Histonet] Number of blocks
>
> In fact, can you share them with all of histonet?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 25, 2012, at 7:33 AM, "Hannen, Valerie" <Valerie.Hannen <@t> parrishmed.com> wrote:
>
>> Rene,
>>
>> I have been asked in the past about productivity in our department. Can you share those articles with me as well?
>>
>> Thanks!!
>>
>> Valerie
>>
>> Valerie A. Hannen, MLT(ASCP),HTL,SU(FL)
>> Histology Section Chief
>> Parrish Medical Center
>> 951 N. Washington Ave.
>> Titusville, Florida 32976
>> Phone:(321) 268-6333 ext. 7506
>> Fax: (321) 268-6149
>> valerie.hannen <@t> parrishmed.com
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Rene J Buesa
>> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:18 AM
>> To: Dorothy Ragland-Glass; Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>> Subject: Re: [Histonet] Number of blocks
>>
>> Hi Dorothy:
>> Your manager is wrong and probably influenced by some "productivity consultant" trying to "appear tough" or preparing to justiffy a staff reduction.
>> The average sectioning productivity obtained in 325 histology laboratories (221 in the US and 114 in 24 foreign countries) is 24 blocks per hour.
>> Under separate cover I am sending two articles dealing with this issue and that of staffing that you will be able to show to your manager.
>> Ren? J.
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Dorothy Ragland-Glass <techmana12 <@t> yahoo.com>
>> To: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 8:38 AM
>> Subject: [Histonet] Number of blocks
>>
>> It was annouced by a histo lab manager that techs are expected to cut 40-50 blocks per hour. That seems to me to be rather high. I don't see quality slides being turned out. It is quantity and profit above patient care. I am old school, and I remember something about quality and patient first. Besides  what kind of impact on morality of the techs, back problems and carpal tunnel syndrom is laying ahead for the cutter after cranking the microtome repeatedly that many blocks without a break.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Histonet mailing list
>> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>> _______________________________________________
>> Histonet mailing list
>> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>>
>> ======================================
>> "This email is intended solely for the use of the individual to
>> whom it is addressed and may contain information that is
>> privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure
>> under applicable law. If the reader of this email is not the
>> intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
>> delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
>> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or
>> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
>> have received this communication in error, please immediately
>> delete this message. Thank you"
>> ======================================
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Histonet mailing list
>> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



------------------------------

Message: 15
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:06:35 -0500
From: "Nails, Felton" <flnails <@t> texaschildrens.org>
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Number of blocks 
To: 'Rene J Buesa' <rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com>, Will Chappell
	<chapcl <@t> yahoo.com>,	"Hannen, Valerie" <Valerie.Hannen <@t> parrishmed.com>
Cc: "Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
	<Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID:
	<C1FE5960057C084CA389CE977790629002C73D74FA <@t> TCDMSG01.ad.texaschildrenshospital.org>
	
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Can you list the article, because I to would be interested. 

-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Rene J Buesa
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:00 AM
To: Will Chappell; Hannen, Valerie
Cc: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Number of blocks 

Will: 
I would like to do that very much but unfortunately Histonet is set in a way that they do not accept atttachments and any e-mail with them will not go through.
Ren? J.


________________________________
From: Will Chappell <chapcl <@t> yahoo.com>
To: "Hannen, Valerie" <Valerie.Hannen <@t> parrishmed.com>
Cc: Rene J Buesa <rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com>; Dorothy Ragland-Glass <techmana12 <@t> yahoo.com>; "Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu" <Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Number of blocks 

In fact, can you share them with all of histonet?

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 25, 2012, at 7:33 AM, "Hannen, Valerie" <Valerie.Hannen <@t> parrishmed.com> wrote:

> Rene,
> 
> I have been asked in the past about productivity in our department. Can you share those articles with me as well?
> 
> Thanks!!
> 
> Valerie
> 
> Valerie A. Hannen, MLT(ASCP),HTL,SU(FL) Histology Section Chief 
> Parrish Medical Center
> 951 N. Washington Ave.
> Titusville, Florida 32976
> Phone:(321) 268-6333 ext. 7506
> Fax: (321) 268-6149
> valerie.hannen <@t> parrishmed.com
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
> [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Rene J 
> Buesa
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:18 AM
> To: Dorothy Ragland-Glass; Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Subject: Re: [Histonet] Number of blocks
> 
> Hi Dorothy:
> Your manager is wrong and probably influenced by some "productivity consultant" trying to "appear tough" or preparing to justiffy a staff reduction.
> The average sectioning productivity obtained in 325 histology laboratories (221 in the US and 114 in 24 foreign countries) is 24 blocks per hour.
> Under separate cover I am sending two articles dealing with this issue and that of staffing that you will be able to show to your manager.
> Ren? J.
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Dorothy Ragland-Glass <techmana12 <@t> yahoo.com>
> To: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 8:38 AM
> Subject: [Histonet] Number of blocks
> 
> It was annouced by a histo lab manager that techs are expected to cut 40-50 blocks per hour. That seems to me to be rather high. I don't see quality slides being turned out. It is quantity and profit above patient care. I am old school, and I remember something about quality and patient first. Besides? what kind of impact on morality of the techs, back problems and carpal tunnel syndrom is laying ahead for the cutter after cranking the microtome repeatedly that many blocks without a break.
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> 
> ======================================
> "This email is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom 
> it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, 
> confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. 
> If the reader of this email is not the intended recipient or the 
> employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the 
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
> distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. 
> If you have received this communication in error, please immediately 
> delete this message. Thank you"
> ======================================
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

______________________________________________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
 The information in this e-mail may be confidential and/or
 privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient or an
 authorized representative of the intended recipient, you
 are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, or
 copying of this e-mail and its attachments, if any, or
 the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you
 have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
 notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this e-mail
 from your computer system.  Thank you.
______________________________________________________________________



------------------------------

Message: 16
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rene J Buesa <rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Number of blocks
To: Davide Costanzo <pathlocums <@t> gmail.com>
Cc: "Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
	<Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Message-ID:
	<1351178637.5641.YahooMailNeo <@t> web163103.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Believe it or not, I did not know that my articles were available in Pubmed.
Perhaps Richard Edwards can give?you the mailing list.
Ren? J.


________________________________
From: Davide Costanzo <pathlocums <@t> gmail.com>
To: Rene J Buesa <rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com> 
Cc: Will Chappell <chapcl <@t> yahoo.com>; "Hannen, Valerie" <Valerie.Hannen <@t> parrishmed.com>; "Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu" <Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu> 
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Number of blocks

Can we get a mailing list for these files? I would love to see these
articles as well. DCostanzo <@t> pathmdlabs.com

Thanks Rene

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 25, 2012, at 8:00 AM, Rene J Buesa <rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com> wrote:

> Will:
> I would like to do that very much but unfortunately Histonet is set in a way that they do not accept atttachments and any e-mail with them will not go through.
> Ren? J.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Will Chappell <chapcl <@t> yahoo.com>
> To: "Hannen, Valerie" <Valerie.Hannen <@t> parrishmed.com>
> Cc: Rene J Buesa <rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com>; Dorothy Ragland-Glass <techmana12 <@t> yahoo.com>; "Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu" <Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [Histonet] Number of blocks
>
> In fact, can you share them with all of histonet?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 25, 2012, at 7:33 AM, "Hannen, Valerie" <Valerie.Hannen <@t> parrishmed.com> wrote:
>
>> Rene,
>>
>> I have been asked in the past about productivity in our department. Can you share those articles with me as well?
>>
>> Thanks!!
>>
>> Valerie
>>
>> Valerie A. Hannen, MLT(ASCP),HTL,SU(FL)
>> Histology Section Chief
>> Parrish Medical Center
>> 951 N. Washington Ave.
>> Titusville, Florida 32976
>> Phone:(321) 268-6333 ext. 7506
>> Fax: (321) 268-6149
>> valerie.hannen <@t> parrishmed.com
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Rene J Buesa
>> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:18 AM
>> To: Dorothy Ragland-Glass; Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>> Subject: Re: [Histonet] Number of blocks
>>
>> Hi Dorothy:
>> Your manager is wrong and probably influenced by some "productivity consultant" trying to "appear tough" or preparing to justiffy a staff reduction.
>> The average sectioning productivity obtained in 325 histology laboratories (221 in the US and 114 in 24 foreign countries) is 24 blocks per hour.
>> Under separate cover I am sending two articles dealing with this issue and that of staffing that you will be able to show to your manager.
>> Ren? J.
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Dorothy Ragland-Glass <techmana12 <@t> yahoo.com>
>> To: Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 8:38 AM
>> Subject: [Histonet] Number of blocks
>>
>> It was annouced by a histo lab manager that techs are expected to cut 40-50 blocks per hour. That seems to me to be rather high. I don't see quality slides being turned out. It is quantity and profit above patient care. I am old school, and I remember something about quality and patient first. Besides? what kind of impact on morality of the techs, back problems and carpal tunnel syndrom is laying ahead for the cutter after cranking the microtome repeatedly that many blocks without a break.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Histonet mailing list
>> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>> _______________________________________________
>> Histonet mailing list
>> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>>
>> ======================================
>> "This email is intended solely for the use of the individual to
>> whom it is addressed and may contain information that is
>> privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure
>> under applicable law. If the reader of this email is not the
>> intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
>> delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
>> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or
>> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
>> have received this communication in error, please immediately
>> delete this message. Thank you"
>> ======================================
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Histonet mailing list
>> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

End of Histonet Digest, Vol 107, Issue 31
*****************************************
This message contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message.




More information about the Histonet mailing list