[Histonet] Validation of new equipment

[Rene J Buesa]

Your client and immediate supervisor is the pathologists, and s/he is also the one who has to answer directly to your inspecting authority, be it CAP or any other.
Therefore, is s/he is satisfied with the way the tissues you process in a new tissue processor turn out, that is sufficient.
Any discrepancy of methodology with the inspecting authority let him/her to deal it with.
René J.

--- On Thu, 3/15/12, Laurie <@t> blufrogpath.com <Laurie <@t> blufrogpath.com> wrote:


From: Laurie <@t> blufrogpath.com <Laurie <@t> blufrogpath.com>
Subject: [Histonet] Validation of new equipment
To: "Histonet post" <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Date: Thursday, March 15, 2012, 5:15 PM



   If  I  am  validating  a new tissue processor, can I just process a v   ariety  of  tissues  and  have  the pathologist sign off that they are
   acce=  ptable,  or  do  I  need to do a parallel run with tissue on an
   established pro= cessor and compare the results?

   




   


   Laurie
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet