[Histonet] FW: 1 H&E slide vs. 2

Rene J Buesa rjbuesa <@t> yahoo.com
Wed Apr 13 09:52:04 CDT 2011


There is not such a study. Cutting 2 vs. 1 H&E/block is merely a preference issue amongst pathologists. Now, if you refer to TWO different levels, that is a different issue.
Two consecutive-serial sections from each block should not have a diagnostic impact BUT two different levels, separated by 20-25 sections, may.
That is a decision to take by the pathologist.
René J.

--- On Tue, 4/12/11, Eugenia Thomas <eugenia902d1 <@t> hotmail.com> wrote:


From: Eugenia Thomas <eugenia902d1 <@t> hotmail.com>
Subject: [Histonet] FW: 1 H&E slide vs. 2
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Date: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 11:14 PM







From: eugenia902d1 <@t> hotmail.com
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: 1 H&E slide vs. 2
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:06:59 -0400




Good afternoon everyone,

Does anyone know of an article or statistics discussing the impact (medical diagnosing) of cutting 2 H&E slides per block verses 1 for all routine work?


Genia
                          _______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



      


More information about the Histonet mailing list