[Histonet] Re: Histonet Digest, Vol 83, Issue 46

Miranda D. Felton miranda.felton <@t> gmail.com
Sat Oct 30 12:42:44 CDT 2010


Does anyone know of a cytology listserv?

Thank you
Miranda

Sent from my iPod

On Oct 30, 2010, at 1:00 PM, histonet-request <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu  
wrote:

> Send Histonet mailing list submissions to
>    histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    histonet-request <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    histonet-owner <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Histonet digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. RE: lymph nodes peeling out of OCT (Monfils, Paul)
>   2. PLP fixative (Truscott, Tom)
>   3. Precipitating Silver (Sheila Haas)
>   4. RE: Precipitating Silver (Monfils, Paul)
>   5. RE: PLP fixative (WILLIAM DESALVO)
>   6. IHC Staining Problem (Jennifer Hill)
>   7. Laura Miller is Out of  the Office.
>      (Laura.Miller <@t> leica-microsystems.com)
>   8. RE: RE: breast fixation times (Patsy Ruegg)
>   9. cryostat question (historsd <@t> aol.com)
>  10. Re: IHC Staining Problem (Jennifer MacDonald)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:13:44 -0400
> From: "Monfils, Paul" <PMonfils <@t> Lifespan.org>
> Subject: RE: [Histonet] lymph nodes peeling out of OCT
> To: <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
> Message-ID:
>    <4EBFF65383B74D49995298C4976D1D5E075E08F9 <@t> LSRIEXCH1.lsmaster.lifespan.org 
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="us-ascii"
>
> I place all tissues in liquid OCT for at least 15 minutes before
> freezing.  This virtually eliminates the problem of tissue sections
> separating from the OCT after sectioning.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:55:45 -0700
> From: "Truscott, Tom" <ttruscot <@t> vetmed.wsu.edu>
> Subject: [Histonet] PLP fixative
> To: "histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu"
>    <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
> Message-ID:
>     
> <44F1D6D7EB8CC84F92859EE5C4E6ECB4011B20F1B562 <@t> CVMMBX.vetmed.wsu.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I am seeking basic information on PLP fixative. What is it? Can I  
> make it or buy it? How long does fixation take for lymph node?  
> Thanks in advance, Tom Truscott
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Sheila Haas <micropathlabs <@t> yahoo.com>
> Subject: [Histonet] Precipitating Silver
> To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Message-ID: <450265.9811.qm <@t> web57802.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Has anyone heard of precipitating silver out of a solution by adding  
> table salt?
> I read this somewhere as a means of disposing of silver easily. Any  
> info would
> be appreciated.
> Thanks,
>
> Sheila Haas
> Laboratory Supervisor
> MicroPath Laboratories, Inc.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:02:26 -0400
> From: "Monfils, Paul" <PMonfils <@t> Lifespan.org>
> Subject: RE: [Histonet] Precipitating Silver
> To: <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
> Message-ID:
>    <4EBFF65383B74D49995298C4976D1D5E075E090C <@t> LSRIEXCH1.lsmaster.lifespan.org 
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Yes, it is easy to do. Since silver chloride is insoluble in water,  
> chloride added to a solution containing ionic silver will cause the  
> white compound to precipitate out immediately.  It will settle out  
> onto the bottom of the container overnight, or can be filtered out.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet- 
> bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Sheila Haas
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 1:56 PM
> To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Subject: [Histonet] Precipitating Silver
>
> Has anyone heard of precipitating silver out of a solution by adding  
> table salt?
> I read this somewhere as a means of disposing of silver easily. Any  
> info would
> be appreciated.
> Thanks,
>
> Sheila Haas
> Laboratory Supervisor
> MicroPath Laboratories, Inc.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:52:06 -0600
> From: WILLIAM DESALVO <wdesalvo.cac <@t> hotmail.com>
> Subject: RE: [Histonet] PLP fixative
> To: <ttruscot <@t> vetmed.wsu.edu>, histonet
>    <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
> Message-ID: <BAY151-w591FEECED7C9459D94D71391450 <@t> phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> Follow the links for a receipe.
>
> www.pathology.ufl.edu/~molecular/PLP%20Fixative.doc
>
> http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/atniehs/labs/lep/path-support/immuno/reagents.cfm
>
> www.hopkinsmedicine.org/.../multimedia/text_documents/Recipes_For_Making_PLP_Fixative.doc
>
>
> William DeSalvo, B.S., HTL(ASCP)
>
>
>
>
>
>> From: ttruscot <@t> vetmed.wsu.edu
>> To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:55:45 -0700
>> Subject: [Histonet] PLP fixative
>>
>> I am seeking basic information on PLP fixative. What is it? Can I  
>> make it or buy it? How long does fixation take for lymph node?  
>> Thanks in advance, Tom Truscott
>> _______________________________________________
>> Histonet mailing list
>> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
>> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 20:05:13 +0000
> From: Jennifer Hill <jhill <@t> vet.k-state.edu>
> Subject: [Histonet] IHC Staining Problem
> To: histonet <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
> Message-ID:
>    <8AA2173DC209CA438077A832FF98BD7F02806442 <@t> VETMXHT.ads.vet.k-state.edu 
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I hope someone can help me with a problem I've been having with my  
> CD79a hand stain.  This is a stain that was validated and working  
> perfectly, when a few months ago I started having reduced, to no  
> staining on my controls, with the occasional run staining a little  
> stronger. I followed the discussion not too long ago with the person  
> who was having similar problems, but the suggestions didn't seem to  
> apply (I use Tween 20 in my PBS rinses, and we use APEX slides from  
> Surgipath-not Fischer Plus).  I've tried everything I can think of  
> and I hope someone may have some other ideas.  For reference this is  
> for a veterinary diagnostic lab, not a human lab, and this is the  
> only stain we've been having this issue with.
>
> My protocol is as follows: After deparfinization/rehydration,
> AR for 20 min in the steamer in Biogenex Citra Solution (I've gotten  
> new Citra Solution, tried a pressure cooker)
> 5 min peroxide quench, followed by a 10 min protein block using  
> Dako's Protein Block-Serum Free
> 60 min Primary incubation (Dako CD79a) at 37 C (decreased dilution  
> from 1:100 to 1:65, new bottle of antibody)
> 30 min incubation at room temp of ImmPRESS anti-Mouse Reagent from  
> Vector
> Develop stain with DAB chromogen from Vector
>
> Washes of PBS/Tween 20 follow between steps
>
> Thank you,
> Jennifer Hill
> Research Assistant
> Kansas State University
> Veterinary Diagnostic Lab
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:34:50 -0500
> From: Laura.Miller <@t> leica-microsystems.com
> Subject: [Histonet] Laura Miller is Out of  the Office.
> To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Message-ID:
>    <OFDDC515A4.934C900D-ON862577CB.007C0A48-862577CB.007C0A48 <@t> leica-microsystems.com 
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
>
> I will be out of the office starting  10/29/2010 and will not return  
> until
> 11/01/2010.
>
> I am out of the office for the rest of the day.  I will be back on  
> Monday!
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:38:02 -0600
> From: "Patsy Ruegg" <pruegg <@t> ihctech.net>
> Subject: RE: [Histonet] RE: breast fixation times
> To: "'Kuhnla, Melissa'" <Melissa.Kuhnla <@t> chsli.org>,    "'Feher,  
> Stephen'"
>    <sfeher <@t> CMC-NH.ORG>,    "'Tench, Bill'" <Bill.Tench <@t> pph.org>,  
> "'Weems,
>    Joyce'" <JWeems <@t> sjha.org>,    <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
> Message-ID: <0AD2F85778424E90B81B4CA2D469CDDC <@t> prueggihctechlt>
> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="us-ascii"
>
> Melissa,
>
> Just because the clone you are using is not recommended in the  
> guidelines
> does not mean that you cannot use it.  You have to validate it the  
> same as
> using a clone they do recommend, but the bottom line is you can use  
> what
> ever you want in what ever way you want as long as you validate the  
> protocol
> on samples generated in your lab.  If you want to use a fixation or
> processing different from what is recommended you have to compare it  
> to
> formalin fixation and "standard" (whatever that is) paraffin  
> processing, you
> would have to do a side by side comparison on the same tissue.  As  
> long as
> you follow the fixation and processing guidelines you can use the ab  
> u want
> to use without comparing it to abs they recommend, as far as I can  
> tell.
> You must validate that ab on at least 25 samples generated in your
> institution just as you would have to validate an antibody they do
> recommend.
>
> Regards,
>
> Patsy
>
>
>
> Patsy Ruegg, HT(ASCP)QIHC
> IHCtech
> 12635 Montview Blvd. Ste.215
> Aurora, CO 80045
> 720-859-4060
> fax 720-859-4110
> www.ihctech.net
> www.ihcrg.org
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of  
> Kuhnla,
> Melissa
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 3:51 AM
> To: Feher, Stephen; Tench, Bill; Weems, Joyce;
> histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Subject: RE: [Histonet] RE: breast fixation times
>
> One more question regarding ER/PR/Her2..who am I kidding, we will be
> talking about them forever!!  With regards to the ER/PR publication:  
> The
> PR clone (Ventana 1E2) that we currently use is not listed as
> 'acceptable'. Is anyone else in this situation?  Are you switching to
> another clone?? Have you come across anything speaking of this  
> scenario?
> What to do if you currently run a clone not mentioned?  It will be a
> relatively easy validation for me, but I can't image I am alone here.
> Thanks, Melissa
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Feher,
> Stephen
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 5:50 PM
> To: Tench, Bill; Weems, Joyce; histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Subject: RE: [Histonet] RE: breast fixation times
>
> Great discussion, comprehensive yet concise.  Thanks Bill and Joyce  
> and
> Melissa.
>
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Tench,
> Bill
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 12:26 PM
> To: Weems, Joyce; histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Subject: [Histonet] RE: breast fixation times
>
> My apologies for not including the updates accurate for ER and PR.
>
>
> Bill Tench
> Associate Dir. Laboratory Services
> Chief, Cytology Services
> Palomar Medical Center
> 555 E. Valley Parkway
> Escondido, California  92025
> Bill.Tench <@t> pph.org
> Voice: 760- 739-3037
> Fax: 760-739-2604
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Weems, Joyce [mailto:JWeems <@t> sjha.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 9:22 AM
> To: Tench, Bill; histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Subject: RE: breast fixation times
>
> Thanks for this good explanation, Bill.
>
> One can not follow the guidelines and document the variant in the
> report, but not following them could hurt the patient if there is a
> clinical trial they might participate in. Clinical trials follow the
> protocol to the letter and if the FDA requirement is not met, the
> patient can not participate.
>
> The times were extended for ER and PR to 72 hours, but NOT yet for  
> Her2.
> So...because the tissue is all the same, we must follow the 48 hour
> limit. We just had a case this weekend. Had the clinical staff  
> remove it
> from the processor on Sun morning and embedded it Monday. We don't
> ususally have this problem as we are a 6-day lab, but it was finished
> too late on Fri.
>
> Cheers,j
>
> Joyce Weems
> Pathology Manager
> Saint Joseph's Hospital
> 5665 Peachtree Dunwoody Rd NE
> Atlanta, GA 30342
> 678-843-7376 - Phone
> 678-843-7831 - Fax
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> [mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Tench,
> Bill
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 11:50
> To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Subject: [Histonet] breast fixation times
>
> There is no exception for core biopsies, as reasonable as that may  
> seem.
> I have had that discussion with the purveyors of the guidelines.  6-48
> is the current standard.  there was a lot of discussion about  
> exceeding
> 48 and using the FISH option.  My colleague responsible for this  
> wrote:
> It is in the CAP checklist, ANP 22998:
>
> If the laboratory assesses Her2 by IHC or Her2 gene amplification by
> in-situ hybridization (FISH, CISH, SISH), does the lab have a  
> documented
> procedure for ensuring appropriate length of fixation of specimens
> tested?
>
> Specimens subject to Her2 testing should be fixed in 10% neutral
> buffered formalin for at least 6 hours and no longer than 48 hours.
> While fixation outside of these time limits is not an absolute  
> exclusion
> criterion for Her2 testing, labs should qualify any negative results  
> for
> specimens fixed less than 6 hours or longer than 48 hours. For cases
> with negative results by IHC, consideration should be given to
> performing confirmatory analysis by in-situ hybridization.
>
> There is also a table in the original ASCO/CAP Guideline
> Recommendations for Her2 in Breast Cancer (Arch Pathol Lab Med, Vol  
> 131,
> Jan 2007) that states that tissue fixed in formalin for greater than  
> 48
> hours is not an absolute exclusion criterion, but if known to be fixed
> longer than 48 hours or unknown, the report should qualify any  
> negative
> result with this information (table 6).
>
> As for upcoming changes, i don't know other than these time  
> limitations
> are suppose to be more rigorously applied to ER and PR, along with the
> newly instituted documentation of time between excision and time  
> placed
> in fixative.
>
>
> Bill Tench
> Associate Dir. Laboratory Services
> Chief, Cytology Services
> Palomar Medical Center
> 555 E. Valley Parkway
> Escondido, California  92025
> Bill.Tench <@t> pph.org
> Voice: 760- 739-3037
> Fax: 760-739-2604
>
>
> [None] made the following annotations
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Confidential E-Mail: This e-mail is intended only for the person or
> entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
> privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure.
> Dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail or the
> information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is
> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify  
> the
> sender by reply e-mail, and destroy the original message and all  
> copies.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> Confidentiality Notice:
> This e-mail, including any attachments is the property of Catholic
> Health East and is intended for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s).
> It may contain information that is privileged and confidential.  Any
> unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.  
> If
> you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message, and
> reply to the sender regarding the error in a separate email.
>
>
>
> [None] made the following annotations
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Confidential E-Mail: This e-mail is intended only for the person or
> entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
> privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure.
> Dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail or the
> information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is
> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify  
> the
> sender by reply e-mail, and destroy the original message and all  
> copies.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>
>
> The information in this e-mail, and any attachments therein, is  
> confidential
> and for use by the intended addressee only. If this message is  
> received by
> you in error please do not disseminate or read further. Please reply  
> to the
> sender that you have received the message in error, then delete the  
> message.
> Although Catholic Health Services of Long Island attempts to sweep e- 
> mail
> and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that either are
> virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a  
> result of
> viruses. Thank you.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 22:10:21 -0400
> From: historsd <@t> aol.com
> Subject: [Histonet] cryostat question
> To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Message-ID: <8CD45EEBD9B9E32-EA4-3DF2 <@t> webmail-d038.sysops.aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
> Does anyone have 'hands on'  experience performing Mohs using a  
> countertop cryostat?  Can the specimen head be manipulated to  
> acccomodate a badly embedded block? Does the machine stay cold  
> enough to perform Mohs? Any advice would be appreciated.
> My e-mail is historsd <@t> aol.com. Thanks, Susan
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 22:44:58 -0700
> From: Jennifer MacDonald <JMacDonald <@t> mtsac.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Histonet] IHC Staining Problem
> To: Jennifer Hill <jhill <@t> vet.k-state.edu>
> Cc: histonet <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>,
>    histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Message-ID:
>    <OF83C059C1.879738A5-ON882577CC.001F8665-882577CC.001F9C5A <@t> mtsac.edu 
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> How far in advance are your controls being cut?  Are your patient  
> tissues
> staining?
>
>
>
>
> Jennifer Hill <jhill <@t> vet.k-state.edu>
> Sent by: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> 10/29/2010 01:11 PM
>
> To
> histonet <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
> cc
>
> Subject
> [Histonet] IHC Staining Problem
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I hope someone can help me with a problem I've been having with my  
> CD79a
> hand stain.  This is a stain that was validated and working perfectly,
> when a few months ago I started having reduced, to no staining on my
> controls, with the occasional run staining a little stronger. I  
> followed
> the discussion not too long ago with the person who was having similar
> problems, but the suggestions didn't seem to apply (I use Tween 20  
> in my
> PBS rinses, and we use APEX slides from Surgipath-not Fischer  
> Plus).  I've
> tried everything I can think of and I hope someone may have some other
> ideas.  For reference this is for a veterinary diagnostic lab, not a  
> human
> lab, and this is the only stain we've been having this issue with.
>
> My protocol is as follows: After deparfinization/rehydration,
> AR for 20 min in the steamer in Biogenex Citra Solution (I've gotten  
> new
> Citra Solution, tried a pressure cooker)
> 5 min peroxide quench, followed by a 10 min protein block using Dako's
> Protein Block-Serum Free
> 60 min Primary incubation (Dako CD79a) at 37 C (decreased dilution  
> from
> 1:100 to 1:65, new bottle of antibody)
> 30 min incubation at room temp of ImmPRESS anti-Mouse Reagent from  
> Vector
> Develop stain with DAB chromogen from Vector
>
> Washes of PBS/Tween 20 follow between steps
>
> Thank you,
> Jennifer Hill
> Research Assistant
> Kansas State University
> Veterinary Diagnostic Lab
>
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>
> End of Histonet Digest, Vol 83, Issue 46
> ****************************************



More information about the Histonet mailing list