[Histonet] Cryostat Question Please

[O'Donnell, Bill]

Very consistant, easy to use. 

2 drawbacks  

1. We got the decontamination add-on trying to automate the CAP
requirement, but now it seems Thermo says it is not an adequate process.
I believe they are doing more intense studies, but for the time being, I
have to decontaminate it by hand. 

2. OCT and tissue scraps build up under collection device and cause the
mechanism to "clunk" unless buildup is removed. 

These two things add a good chunk of time to my day.

William (Bill) O'Donnell, HT (ASCP) QIHC 
Lead Histologist
Good Samaritan Hospital
10 East 31st Street
Kearney, NE 68847 




-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Paula
Lucas
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 1:29 PM
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Cryostat Question Please

Hello all
 
Has anyone used a Richard-Allan/Thermo-Fisher HM550 MP cryostat?  If so,
what is your opinion/pros and cons?
 
Thanks so much in advance,
Paula
Lab Manager
BP Medical Group
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet