[Histonet] Cryostat Question Please
billodonnell <@t> catholichealth.net
Wed Nov 24 15:14:15 CST 2010
Very consistant, easy to use.
1. We got the decontamination add-on trying to automate the CAP
requirement, but now it seems Thermo says it is not an adequate process.
I believe they are doing more intense studies, but for the time being, I
have to decontaminate it by hand.
2. OCT and tissue scraps build up under collection device and cause the
mechanism to "clunk" unless buildup is removed.
These two things add a good chunk of time to my day.
William (Bill) O'Donnell, HT (ASCP) QIHC
Good Samaritan Hospital
10 East 31st Street
Kearney, NE 68847
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Paula
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 1:29 PM
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Cryostat Question Please
Has anyone used a Richard-Allan/Thermo-Fisher HM550 MP cryostat? If so,
what is your opinion/pros and cons?
Thanks so much in advance,
BP Medical Group
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
More information about the Histonet