[Histonet] direct-conjugates for IHC
koellingr <@t> comcast.net
koellingr <@t> comcast.net
Mon May 4 22:54:41 CDT 2009
Jennifer,
In the past, upon occasion when need arose, I'd use directly conjugated primary antibodies. Mainly biotin or dig or peroxidase but also FITC directly to primary. Then can look at it fluorescently or come back with an anti-FITC of some kind (several are good). Used these for my flow but also a lot of IHC. Have never tried the Texas Red route for IHC. What you say is true; direct conjugation can end up giving weaker signal but it doesn't have to be so bad. 1) If you are doing the conjugation, that is great and you have a chance to play with the system. Conjugation can result in near loss of antibody to bind or can result in good Ab binding or if you have the knack it can result in little loss of binding. For flow, the conjugation is not critical since as long as you don't ruin the antibody, it will work since flow reagents are generally used in excess since there is no background (the background is plain sheath fluid) although certainly you can put in too much. For IHC you need to be gentler in conjugation. Don't know your company but if a biotech you might have a BiaCore machine (measure affinity of Ab's) or there are other ways to measure affinity. So I would always keep an aliquot of native antibody and after I did my conjugation, give those people both samples to measure affinity (or how much loss). Tell me immediately if I lost too much Ab binding ability because of my (hopefully not poor) conjugation. In general yes, directly conjugating your primary can weaken signal but it doesn't have to be as much as conventional wisdom or lore makes it.
Raymond Koelling
PhenoPath Labs
Seattle, WA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jennifer Anderson" <janderson <@t> halozyme.com>
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2009 12:04:57 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: [Histonet] direct-conjugates for IHC
Hello everyone!
I work with a scientist who insists on using primary antibodies directly
conjugated with FITC or Texas Red for IHC. In my past experience these
directly conjugated antibodies didn't give a strong enough signal for
use in IHC (I've seen them used only for FACS analysis). I would
appreciate your professional comments.
Thanks again, so much, for your insight!
Jennifer M. Anderson, Scientist
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
11404 Sorrento Valley Road
San Diego, CA 92121
858-704-8333
janderson <@t> halozyme.com <mailto:janderson <@t> halozyme.com>
The information transmitted in this email is confidential and is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed. Delivery of this message to any person other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive confidentiality or any applicable privilege. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by individuals or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited by Halozyme and may be in violation of applicable laws. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete/destroy this email.
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
More information about the Histonet
mailing list