[Histonet] Another CAP question
Amy Porter
portera <@t> msu.edu
Mon Apr 27 12:27:54 CDT 2009
I use my yearly p.m. records, certified themometer maintenance records, I
concentrated more on the function item and not the ongoing results. In my
mind if something is broken or repaired the ongoing results have not been
satisfactory. Hope this helps -
Amy S. Porter, HT (ASCP) QIHC
Investigative HistoPathology Laboratory - Supervisor
2201 Biomedical Physical Sciences Bldg. Rm #2133
East Lansing, MI 48824-3320
Phone: (517) 884-5026
Fax: (517) 432-1368
Email: portera <@t> msu.edu
Web: www.humanpathology.msu.edu
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mary Abosso" <mabosso <@t> unipathllc.com>
To: "Histonet" <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 1:15 PM
Subject: [Histonet] Another CAP question
Good Monday all -
We were just talking about this reg. and wondering how everyone is answering
this? Are instrument maintenance records acceptable?
ANP.23075 - Is there evidence of ongoing evaluation of results of instrument
maintenance and function for all devices?
Mary Abosso
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
More information about the Histonet
mailing list