[Histonet] Another CAP question

Amy Porter portera <@t> msu.edu
Mon Apr 27 12:27:54 CDT 2009

I use my yearly p.m. records, certified themometer maintenance records, I 
concentrated more on the function item and not the ongoing results.  In my 
mind if something is broken or repaired the ongoing results have not been 
satisfactory.  Hope this helps -
Amy S. Porter, HT (ASCP) QIHC
Investigative HistoPathology Laboratory - Supervisor
2201 Biomedical Physical Sciences Bldg.  Rm #2133
East Lansing, MI  48824-3320
Phone:  (517) 884-5026
Fax:  (517) 432-1368
Email:  portera <@t> msu.edu
Web:  www.humanpathology.msu.edu
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mary Abosso" <mabosso <@t> unipathllc.com>
To: "Histonet" <histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 1:15 PM
Subject: [Histonet] Another CAP question

Good Monday all -

We were just talking about this reg. and wondering how everyone is answering 
this?  Are instrument maintenance records acceptable?

ANP.23075 - Is there evidence of ongoing evaluation of results of instrument 
maintenance and function for all devices?

Mary Abosso
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu

More information about the Histonet mailing list