mike <@t> pathview.com
Tue Aug 5 11:48:56 CDT 2008
Yes, please. Any feedback would be great.
I"ve done some preliminary research for use in our software product.
Currently, we use:
1. ~500 cost
2. uses labels and therefore there is a reoccurring cost.
3. labels must be manually applied
1. ~5000 cost
2. no labels, but uses frosted slides, I believe -- there's a reoccurring
3. no labels to apply.
They both use thermal ribbons, print 2 D barcodes, and print 'fast'.
The pslim product has an interesting feature that some labs will find
critical. You can have it determine what to put on slide. The zebra
product only prints what your LIS vendor tells it to print.
I would appreciate any feedback.
PathView Systems | cell: 214.733.7688 | 800.798.3540 | fax: 270.423.0968
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 12:26 PM
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] PSLIM
Am joining the chorus here on feedback re: PSLIM. Any users out there?
Haven't seen anyone respond yet. I think we're all very interested in
opinions good, bad or indifferent.
Thomas Jasper HT (ASCP) BAS
Central Oregon Regional Pathology Services
Bend, OR 97701
tjasper <@t> copc.net
Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
More information about the Histonet