[Histonet] IHC ER/PR controls

Sebree Linda A. LSebree <@t> uwhealth.org
Thu Feb 22 12:35:47 CST 2007

We usually go with stronger controls (scores of 12 out of 12 or slightly
lower).  This probably isn't the best; an array of intensities would be
but no one is complaining.

Linda Sebree, HT(ASCP)
University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics
IHC/ISH Laboratory
600 Highland Ave.
Madison, WI 53792
FAX: (608)262-7174

-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Joyce
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 12:23 PM
To: histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] IHC ER/PR controls

This question is for anyone who uses a Benchmark XT.  We would like to
know at what percentages your pathologists prefer their controls. 11-25%
weak staining or do they prefer the ER/PR controls with a stronger

This message contains confidential information and is intended only for
the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
delete this e-mail from your system.

Histonet mailing list
Histonet <@t> lists.utsouthwestern.edu

More information about the Histonet mailing list