[Histonet] Carter Review

[Kemlo Rogerson]

Subsequent to the Carter Review I wonder what the perception of Brits is
to its effects, if any.

It makes heavy play of managed networks and alludes to pilot Sites; my
question is simple (in keeping with my intellect). Does Carter assume
that his recommendations start at Trust level or at managed network
level? If it assumes networks are not inplace then the pilot Sites I
assume must be looking at their birth, but if the Review assumes that
they are in place then the pilot Sites will be the managed network not
the Trust.

What do you think? Those with networks may have a different opinion than
those of us devoid of them at the moment; I know the Sites don't know
either, do they? 

 
Kemlo Rogerson
Pathology Manager
Ext  3311
DD   01934 647057
Mob 07749 754194
Pager 07659 597107
E-Mail: kemlo.rogerson <@t> nhs.net

Nobody grows old merely by living a number of years. We grow old by
deserting our ideals. Years may wrinkle the skin, but to give up
enthusiasm wrinkles the soul. --Samuel Ullman 


This e-mail is confidential and privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please accept my apologies; please do not disclose, copy or
distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on
its contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
Please inform me that this message has gone astray before deleting it.
Thank you for your co-operation